"...all challenges."review of current mathematics, a perfect representations of mathematics that has the answers to all the challenges ...
What challenges?
-Dan
"...all challenges."review of current mathematics, a perfect representations of mathematics that has the answers to all the challenges ...
(sighs) Will you please just post your paper instead of snippets? It would make it much easier to post intelligent questions.2.18 Multi subtraction "2.12,2.15"
Theorem -subtraction and subtract gap two gaps number.
EVIDENCE -2/.3/2- [1]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1 or
2/.3/2-[.6]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1
2/.3/2\(\displaystyle \fbox{-.} \)[1]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 or
2/.3/2\(\displaystyle \fbox{-.} \) [.6]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 follows
View attachment 27219
The general form
View attachment 27220
The general form of the opposite numbers.
View attachment 27221
View attachment 27222
- That there are arithmetic operations which no current mathematicsWhat challenges are there in the "usual" Mathematics that are "fixed" by your approach?
-Dan
definition - 1 Mathematics SpaceYou are giving a lot of what, I guess, are examples of what you mean but you still haven't given a single definition. Without that, we cannot understand what you are trying to say.
1.google translation - looks like bad translationsFirst: You (or your translator) need to learn English better.
Second: This is more or less Euclid's treatment of ratios. Your notation is different from any I've seen but why do you think that \(\displaystyle 110011\) is any better than \(\displaystyle x \in \[ 0, 2 \] \cup \[ 4, 6 \]\) ? I don't see any practical difference between the two.
I can follow (to a degree) what you are doing and what your notation is but what practical use is this? I see nothing here that I haven't seen before in Topology. It's Geometry just with a different notation.
-Dan