Let S1 be the set of all sets

__EXCEPT S1__with cardinality n.

Let S2 be the set of all subsets of S1 E

__XCEPT S2__with cardinality p.

Then every member of S1 is a member of S2 and every member of S2 is a member of S1. Therefore n=p and Cantors “paradox” is not a paradox.

In all fairness to Suppes, he made the mistake of using intelligible language.