# Thread: Trig. with ratio question

1. ## Trig. with ratio question

Hello,

$\triangle$ABC is an acute triangle and H is the triangle's orthocenter.
Express the ratio of $\triangle$ABH's area to $\triangle$ABC's area through the triangle's angles.
(No sketch is given)

According to the answer key, the answer is supposed to be:
$\frac{\triangle ABH}{\triangle ABC} = \cot\alpha * \cot\beta$

Any help?

Thanks in advance.

2. Please consider the attached figure, given any acute $\triangle ABC$ where $AH_A, BH_B$ and $CH_C$ are three altitudes from the vertices $A,B$ and $C$. And $H$ is the triangle's orthocenter. Also let $\angle A = \alpha$, $\angle B=\beta$ and $\angle C=\gamma$. Also note that $\angle 1+\angle 3=\alpha$ and $\angle 2 + \angle 4=\beta$.

By definition, we have
$\frac{\triangle ABH}{\triangle ABC}=\frac{\frac{1}{2}\cdot HH_C\cdot AB}{\frac{1}{2}\cdot CH_C\cdot AB}=\frac{HH_C}{CH_C}$

Consider the right triangle $\triangle ACH_C$, we have $\cot\alpha =\frac{AH_C}{CH_C}$, which implies that $CH_C=\frac{AH_C}{\cot\alpha}$

Now consider the two right triangles $\triangle ACH_A$ and $\triangle BCH_B$, we have $\angle 1 + \angle\gamma =90$ and $\angle 2 +\angle \gamma =90$, hence $\angle 1 = \angle 2=90-\angle \gamma$

Also $\angle 3 = \angle \alpha - \angle 1 = \angle \alpha -(90-\angle\gamma)=\angle\alpha+\angle\gamma-90=(180-\angle\beta)-90=90-\angle\beta$

From here, let's consider the right triangle $\triangle AHH_C$, we have:
$\tan(\angle 3)=\frac{HH_C}{AH_C}$. But $\angle 3 =90-\angle\beta$, we then have $\tan(\angle 3)=\tan(90-\angle\beta)=\cot\beta=\frac{HH_C}{AH_C}$
which implies that $HH_C=AH_C\cdot\cot\beta$

Use the quantities we obtained for $CH_C$ and $HH_C$, we have $\frac{\triangle ABH}{\triangle ABC}=\frac{HH_C}{CH_C}=\frac{AH_C\cdot\cot\beta}{\ frac{AH_C}{\cot\alpha}}=\cot\alpha\cdot\cot\beta$

3. Thanks for your help and clarity, I get it now.. But would you have solved the question the same way if you weren't committed to the desired final answer? I simply don't think they expected me to reach an identity (is this how it's called?) with 'cot'.

4. Originally Posted by loui1410
Thanks for your help and clarity, I get it now.. But would you have solved the question the same way if you weren't committed to the desired final answer? I simply don't think they expected me to reach an identity (is this how it's called?) with 'cot'.
Yes, Loui1410, I agree with you. If you do not provide the desired answer, I might have tried to use $\sin$ or $\cos$, however if you look close to the relations between the heights and bases of the target triangles, $\tan$ or $\cot$ seem to be better choices.

Roy