You have,Originally Posted bygarybarlow

Thus,

Thus,

Thus,

Thus,

Thus,

Thus,

Now cheack,

Notice that does not check with the first equation.

However, does.

Thus, you need to solve,

for all

Results 1 to 11 of 11

- April 3rd 2006, 01:29 PM #1

- Joined
- Mar 2006
- Posts
- 2

- April 3rd 2006, 02:05 PM #2

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- New York City
- Posts
- 10,616
- Thanks
- 10

- April 5th 2006, 10:01 AM #3

- Joined
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 6

- April 5th 2006, 01:08 PM #4

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- New York City
- Posts
- 10,616
- Thanks
- 10

- April 6th 2006, 12:08 AM #5

- Joined
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 6

- April 6th 2006, 02:00 AM #6
## a little trouble!

Well, actually when you are dealing with trigonometric complex functions, a standard trick is to substitute for exponentials. Remember

and after substitution

or

(check this please! calculations are not my strong point )

so the solution is

or

so that

,

where the logarithm is the usual real one, the principal argument and an integer.

- April 6th 2006, 02:47 AM #7

- Joined
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 6

I've not learnt about the exponential stuff you can do with trigonometric equations like that yet.

I thought of another way to solve it

4 sin z + cos z = 0

let:

4 sin z + cos z = k cos(z - a)

4 sin z + cos z = k cos a cos z + k sin a sin z

k sin a = 4

k cos a = 1

=> tan a = 4

a = 1.33

4 sin z + cos z = k cos(z - 1.33)

k = sqrt(4^2 + 1^2)

k = sqrt(17)

4 sin z + cos z = sqrt(5) cos(z - 1.33)

so now you need to solve

sqrt(17) cos(z - 1.33) = 0

- April 6th 2006, 03:01 AM #8

- April 6th 2006, 03:10 AM #9

- Joined
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 6

- April 6th 2006, 03:50 AM #10

- April 6th 2006, 05:59 AM #11

- Joined
- Nov 2005
- From
- New York City
- Posts
- 10,616
- Thanks
- 10