I want to determine the circle through points N, S and V.
I know the distance between N and S.
I know the angle NVS.
How could an expression describing such a circle be constrained given that information?
Thank you!
Printable View
I want to determine the circle through points N, S and V.
I know the distance between N and S.
I know the angle NVS.
How could an expression describing such a circle be constrained given that information?
Thank you!
Hej,
if - and only if - the 3 points are placed as in the attached sketch then
The red lines are the radii which form 2 isosceles triangles which can be split into right triangles.
The angle c at the center is calculated by:
The triangleis an isosceles triangle.
so
Great answer, and fast, thanks alot!
I can puzzle together the rest of what I need from this point. Magnificent.
Hello, Encircled!
Quote:
I want to determine the circle through points N, S and V.
I know the distance between N and S.
I know the angle NVS.
How could an expression describing such a circle be constrained given that information?
We have a circle with centerCode:* * *
* *
* d/2 M d/2 *
N o- - - - + - - - -o S
\ * | * /
* \ * θ|θ *r / *
* \ o / *
* \ O / *
\ /
* \ / *
* \ / *
* \θ/ *
* o *
V
Chord
. . Midpoint
Angle
Draw radii
In
Therefore: .
I rephrased the question here:
http://mathhelpforum.com/geometry/21...gle-known.html
(Because at first I actually failed to find this, my own, old thread, duh)
Please see it in order to maybe clearer understand what I'm looking for.
And actually, now when I look at it, there are some misunderstandings in this thread here.
earboth:
I do not know angles x or y. I only know the angle NVS = x+y.
So I can't solve for radius according to your formula there.
Soroban:
Why would angles NOS = 2 NVS, and MOS = NVS?
It looks wrong.
I borrow this fine ASCII art and introduce in it the point L.
Now, since L is on the opposite side of the chord, as seen from the circle origo O, does it still hold that the angle NLS = half the angle NOS?
It is supposed to hold for any point V on the same circle which the chord crosses, but intuitively, that angle seems much larger when V is at L on the smaller side of a chord. Is another relationship at play there?
Code:*L *
* *
* d/2 M d/2 *
N o- - - - + - - - -o S
\ * | * /
* \ * θ|θ *r / *
* \ o / *
* \ O / *
\ /
* \ / *
* \ / *
* \θ/ *
* o *
V