I have the problem:
The scalar projection of a vector v on a vector W is the length of v on w.
v=3i-4j+k
w=2i-2j+6
Now i thought i could just do this:
(v*w)/|w|
But then i end up with 24/sqrt(31)
but the answer is supposed to be 24/7
I have also tried going the long way by finding the angle and using the cos(x)=a/c to find the length but i end up with the same wrong answer.
Thank you.
I noticed i had made a small typo.
it was supposed to be w=2i-3j+6k
As for the question itself, my native language is not english so i have tried to translate it. Something might have gotten "lost in translation" I will try to translate another way:
Scalar Projection of a vector v on a vector w is the length of v along w. Make use of the dot product to calculate the Scalar Projection in each case.
But i noticed you used ||w|| insted of |w|. I have not seen that before. Do you mean to take the absolute value of the length of the vector? Isnt that redundant? I thought the length of a vector was always >= 0
In most modern textbooks the symbol is used to distinguish length of a vector from the absolute value of a sclar. So that Take a look at this.
I know perfectly well what scalar projections are.
Thank you, in my book they have only used single | for both the abs value of the scalar and for the length of a vector. But I see the benefits of using the double || for the length of a vector.
I apologize if I caused any offence. I only repeated the question exactly as it is written in my textbook(see image and link to Google translate)
Google translate
Edit:
My apology is not conditional.
the english translation is probably something more along the lines of:
"the (scalar) projection of a vector v on w is the length of v in the direction of w".
the (vector) projection of v in the direction of w is usually defined to be:
as:
we have that:
.
note that this agrees with Plato's post, up to sign.
if the angle between v and w is less than (or equal to) a quarter-circle, then the two definitions coincide.
if the angle between v and w is more than a quarter-circle, then v points "away" from w, and one uses .
in other words, Plato's definition is more "accurate" (conveys more geometrical information) than what your book apparently says (real numbers can have a sign, as well as a magnitude), and is in fact, the standard definition.
in your original problem (as amended), it makes no difference which formula you use, as the angle between (3,-4,1) and (2,-3,6) is indeed less than a quarter-circle.
so we have that the scalar projection is: (3*2 + (-4)*(-3) + 1*6)/(√[2^{2} + (-3)^{2} + 6^{2}])
= (6 + 12 + 6)/√49 = 24/7
Thank you, you’re explanation has helped me understand the issue a little better Deveno. I had not thought of the sign issue at all.
The reason I posted my question again was because I had tried exactly what Plato suggested and gotten the wrong answer. When you now showed me that it indeed resulted in the right answer I went back over my work and the logs on my calculator and discovered my error.
I had entered sqrt[2^2 + (-3)^2 + 6^2] as sqrt[2^2+-3^2+6^2]. When I went over and did all the boring operations manually I discovered that this caused the (-3)^2 to be calculated as -9 instead of 9.
You learn from your mistakes right?
Thanks both of you.