Thread: harmonic mean vs arithmetic mean.

Three cars goes from A to B in 2mph, 3mph and 4 mph.

In this case Harmonic mean of speed is 2 10/13 mph and while the arithmetic mean is 3 mph.

How do you logically prove that harmonic mean is more exact in this situation.

Instead of three cars, let's make the problem more intuitive by using one car going from A to B at 2 mph, then B to A at 3 mph, then A to B at 4 mph. We wish to find the average speed.

WLOG, suppose the distance from A to B is 1 mile. Then





, which is the harmonic mean of 2, 3, and 4.

Originally Posted by hisajesh

Three cars goes from A to B in 2mph, 3mph and 4 mph.

In this case Harmonic mean of speed is 2 10/13 mph and while the arithmetic mean is 3 mph.

How do you logically prove that harmonic mean is more exact in this situation.

That question really doesn't make sense. What do you mean by "more exact"?

@ all: Books suggest to use harmonic mean instead of arithmetic mean in such scenarios, could you explain why do we use harmonic mean and why not arithmetic mean.

Originally Posted by hisajesh

@ all: Books suggest to use harmonic mean instead of arithmetic mean in such scenarios, could you explain why do we use harmonic mean and why not arithmetic mean.

Because the car travels at 2 mph for a longer time than it does at 3 mph, etc, similar to a weighted average (as opposed to an average or arithmetic mean, which weighs 2,3,4 equally). See above solution.