Re: Sample Size Proportions

Hey JB1974.

Can you outline specifically what hypotheses you are trying to test.

Re: Sample Size Proportions

Chiro,

The testing of the components results in a simple pass/fail. We do not have measurement data

THere are 2 possibilities:

1. Historical yield is 47%. How many samples do I need to test to demonstrate a 5% increase in yield with 95% confidence. Do I need to take "power" into account? It is not in the formula I have shown in my first post.

2. I need to make a change to a process. THerefore I would like to run a number of samples with the original conditions, followed by running a second set of samples with the changed conditions. Is there a way to determine how many samples in each sample set I need to run in order to show at least a 5% improvement in yield at 95% confidence with the new conditions. Again, does power need to be taken into account.

THank you for you interest.

j

Re: Sample Size Proportions

In this case if you are using a large sample size your interval will be something like (x_bar-1.96*se,x_bar+1.96*se) where se is the standard error that for a proportion using normal approximation will be SQRT(x_bar(1-x_bar)/n) where n is your sample size, and x_bar is the sample mean (point estimate of the proportion variable).

Now if you are finding a number where-by 1.96*se = 0.05, then you have x_bar which means you can re-arrange to get n in terms of x_bar from the formula for se.

The thing is though that this is a two-tailed test and if you want a one-tailed test then you will need to adjust the calculation (and consider that you can only get proportions between 0 and 1).

If you don't want to use the Normal approximation, then the same idea is used but for the likelihood (which is the binomial distribution).

Are you using a normal approximation or not?