Hey colin271828.

It is a subtle thing, but if you look at the graph you'll notice that the cumulative frequency graphic doesn't start at 0 but instead starts at 6 with x = 160 so there are some values less than 160, but they are not that likely).

With regards to the maximum, I agree that this does not make any sense. The only way that I can interpret what happened is that the graph is an approximation, but I think this doesn't really cut it if this is the case.

The minimum makes sense, but I agree with you that the maximum makes no sense since there are 60 tomatoes which means the 190g weight is the maximum given that graph.