Isn't it true that 0 defects, (exactly) 1 defect, 2 defects and 3 defects are four disjoint events that cover the whole sample space?
question goes like this.
Food inspector examines 3 products in a group to determine if they are acceptable. From past experience it is known that the probability of finding no defects in the sample of 3 if 0.990, the probability of 1 defect in the sample of 3 is 0.006, and the probability of finding 2 defects in the sample of 3 is 0.003.
What is the probability of finding 3 defecting unites in the sample of 3??
I did .99 x .006 x .003 = .00001782 CLOSE but not the correct answer. I am not getting my stats class, something is not clicking. There is a piece of information that is not helping me connect all of this.
So what am I doing wrong?Or is it 3 times each number .99, .006, .003?
Any help would be great, thank you.
Can you explain what you wrote? 3 non conformning units is asking DEFECTIVE correct? in a sample of 3.
Funny how I can do thermodynamics, but can't do stats. GO FIGURE (scratching head).
What emakarov wrote basically means that there are four, and only four possible outcomes for the 3 units, and that they don't overlap in any way (i.e. it's the probability of having *exactly* 1 defect, rather than *at least* 1 defect). You're told the probability of finding no defects, 1 defect, and 2 defects; the only remaining possibility is 3 defects (as there are only 3 units in the sample). Now you just need to recall that the probability of all possible events must add up to 1 (i.e P(none) + P(one) + P(two) + P(three) = 1). At this point you have all the information you need to determine P(three).
What I mean, briefly, is that one cannot have exactly 2 and exactly 3 defects (and similarly for other non-equal numbers). Also, the possible number of defects is from 0 to 3; there are no other options. So, the probabilities for different number of defects should add up to 1.
More formally, we can order the three products and say that an examination produces an ordered triple where if product #i is defect-free and otherwise. Then the sample space (the set of all possible outcomes) is , i.e., the set of all triples of 0 and 1. The event "a sample of 3 products has exactly n defects" is the subset of Ω that includes triples having exactly n 1's. Though there may be a different construction of the sample space here, the main point is that those events (subsets) for n = 0, 1, 2, 3 are disjoint and their union is the whole Ω. Therefore, their probabilities add up to 1.
SO the answer to this is.
p(.99)+p(.006)+p(.003)+p(3 defects) = 1
So need to solve for P which is .001??
Question, is there a time when we use addition, then multiplication? In the examples the teacher said it was close to used multiplication, why I used it above. But reading in my book to use that is when they are independent and do not affect and in sequence?
So they have to be two different things that have no association to each other?? like a dice and card, where if you have a card and another card, not the same?
Just trying to understand, any help would be good. I have even gone on websites, but they are just basics, nothing in depth to what I am looking for.
As for the issue of addition and multiplication, and dependent and independent events, I'll try to give some examples to clarify.
The use of addition and multiplication depends on whether the events are alternatives to each other, or whether they can occur together.
Consider a roll of a fair six-sided die. Note that the events are independent, in that the result of each throw has no impact on the probability of the throws that follow it. The probability of getting a 1 (or any other number for that matter) is obviously .
If you are then asked to determine the probability of throwing 3 consecutive 1s, that is 1 AND 1 AND 1, then the probability is .
Another case might be to determine the probability that in a single throw of the die you obtain a 1 OR 3. In this instance you take the probability of each event and add them .
A case involving both addition and multiplication might be the following: Find the probability of obtain a 1 OR 3 on the first throw, AND a 5 on the second throw. Here, the probability becomes . Here you sum the probabilities for the OR part, and then multiply the result of that by the probability of throwing a 5, because it's (1 OR 3) AND 5. I hope that's helpful for independent events. I'll put dependent events in a separate post.
Since I have already typed it...
marginal legal advice."
As for dependent events, you're now considering scenarios where the outcome of one event impacts the probability of events that follow it. A classic case is a bag containing Red and Blue balls, which are removed, *without* replacement. The use of multiplication and addition is no different than for independent events (i.e. AND uses multiplication, OR uses addition), the difference is that the actual probabilities of events will not remain the same.
As an example, consider a bag containing 17 balls; 10 Red and 7 Blue. Before any balls are removed from the bag, the probability that a ball, selected at random, will be Red is , while the probability that it will be Blue is .
A ball is now removed, without replacement, which happens to be Red, obviously there are now only 16 balls in the bag, 9 now being Red, and still 7 Blue, so the probabilities become:
So, if we now consider the bag in its original state and ask what is the probability that a Red, followed by a Blue, followed by another Blue will be drawn at random from the bag, without replacement? Hopefully it's fairly clear that the problem looks like this:
I hope that's clear (incidentally, I agree with emakarov; I'm happy to help with improving conceptual understanding, but I'm just a guy with an Internet connection , so caveat emptor and all that!).