Summation Notation in Generalized Bernoulli Trials
So I'm reading through Robert Ash's Basic Probability Theory and I see the summation notation reproduced in the picture below.
https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/_6...%20%281%29.JPG
I'm not familiar with this sort of writing--are we summing first from
to some assumed upper bound like
, then do it again from
and so on?
If so then I'm have a hard time seeing how the first equality is supposed to be true. I would think the RHS would come out p_{1}^{n} + ...