Math Help - Probability distribution table help w/ Tree diag .Two values coming strangely.

Hi again.

I'm having a problem with a tree diagram and the subsequent prob.dist.table. Here's the question:

Every day Eduardo tries to phone his friend. Every time he phones there is a 50% chance that his friend will answer. If his friend answers, Eduardo does not phone again on that day. If his friend does not answer, Eduardo tries again in a few minutes’ time. If his friend has not answered after 4 attempts, Eduardo does not try again on that day.

(i) Draw a tree diagram to illustrate this situation.

The figure:



This is correct.

(ii) Let X be the number of unanswered phone calls made by Eduardo on a day. Copy and complete the table showing the probability distribution of X.

This is what I'm seeing seeing:

x 0 1 2 3 4
P(X=x) 1/2 1/2 1/4 1/8 1/16

But, this seems to be wrong. Once again, I have no clue as to why this is so.

Any help?

Check your second value.

Suppose that you flip a coin until a head appears.
However, there are no more than four flips allowed.
Let X equal the number of tails to appear.
Then is it not the case that
That is exactly one tail. That means the second flip yields a head.
What is the probability of
Now apply this model to your problem.

Thanks for the reply.

Still don't get it though. In your example, we keep flipping a coin until we get a head, after which we would stop flipping the coin. But only four flips are allowed. X is the number of tails. So, for the first flip, we can either get H or T. Both have equal probability. For the first flip, getting H would be the same as getting X=0 ('0' or 'no' Tail). But if we get T on the first flip, would that not mean X=1 ('1' Tail)? And seeing as their probabilities are the same (0.5), why would we multiply it by 0.5 a second time? That would mean a Tail and another Tail.

???

Originally Posted by SolCon

Still don't get it though. In your example, we keep flipping a coin until we get a head, after which we would stop flipping the coin. But only four flips are allowed. X is the number of tails. So, for the first flip, we can either get H or T. Both have equal probability. For the first flip, getting H would be the same as getting X=0 ('0' or 'no' Tail). But if we get T on the first flip, would that not mean X=1 ('1' Tail)? And seeing as their probabilities are the same (0.5), why would we multiply it by 0.5 a second time? That would mean a Tail and another Tail.

The model is exactly like the friend's answering(Heads) or not answering(tails) the phone.
In a given day he makes at most four calls.
The only way to get exactly one unanswered call is to fail the fist time and the succeed the second time.
That gives

Hello, SolCon!

Every day Eduardo tries to phone his friend.
Every time he phones there is a 50% chance that his friend will answer.
If his friend answers, Eduardo does not phone again on that day.
If his friend does not answer, Eduardo tries again in a few minutes’ time.
If his friend has not answered after 4 attempts, Eduardo does not try again on that day.

(i) Draw a tree diagram to illustrate this situation.

The figure:



This is correct.


(ii) Let be the number of unanswered phone calls made by Eduardo on a day.
. . Copy and complete the table showing the probability distribution of

This is what I'm seeing:

. . . This is incorrect.

But this seems to be wrong.
Once again, I have no clue as to why this is so.

Any help?

You must use the probabilities out to the 's.


We can talk our way through the branches.


For 0 unanswered calls, the friend answer the first time.
. .

For 1 unanswered call, the friend answers the second time.
. .

For 2 unanswered calls, the friend answers the third time.
. .

For 3 unanswered calls, the friend answers the fourth time.
. .

For 4 unanswered calls, Eduardo stops calling.
. .


Your table should look like this:

. .

Ahh, thank you both for the helpful explanations.

Didn't realize that for the first unanswered call, the second time had to be discontinued, otherwise he'd be trying again.

I've got it now.

Thanks again.