Results 1 to 5 of 5

Math Help - Have I finished this?

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6

    Have I finished this?

    I'm asked to find the the times (0<t<2pi) that two vectors are perpendicular.

    The two vectors are perpendicular when their Dot product is zero. Taking the Dot product, and equating to zero gives:

    2.Cos(2t).Sin(2t) - 4.Cos(t).Sin(t)=0

    Or:

    2.Cos(2t).Sin(2t)= 4Cos(t)Sin(t)

    So the vectors are perpendicular when the above holds true.

    I've sketched the plot of Sin(t), Cos(t), Sin(2t) and Cos(2t).

    The R.H.S. of the equation reduces to zero when either Cos(t) or Sin(t) are zero, this is at ;

    t=0, pi/2, pi, 3pi/2, 2pi, and the above equation holds true.

    I feel like I've done this more by intuition than by mathematical method, and I can't show that these are the only values for which the vectors are perpendicular (though I suspect they are).

    There must be a better way to go about this, and I have a feeling it may be with some trig identity.

    In short, have I got all the values? Is there a better way to do it?

    Many thanks.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Flow Master
    mr fantastic's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    Zeitgeist
    Posts
    16,948
    Thanks
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Taylor Fylde View Post
    I'm asked to find the the times (0<t<2pi) that two vectors are perpendicular.

    The two vectors are perpendicular when their Dot product is zero. Taking the Dot product, and equating to zero gives:

    2.Cos(2t).Sin(2t) - 4.Cos(t).Sin(t)=0

    Or:

    2.Cos(2t).Sin(2t)= 4Cos(t)Sin(t)

    So the vectors are perpendicular when the above holds true.

    I've sketched the plot of Sin(t), Cos(t), Sin(2t) and Cos(2t).

    The R.H.S. of the equation reduces to zero when either Cos(t) or Sin(t) are zero, this is at ;

    t=0, pi/2, pi, 3pi/2, 2pi, and the above equation holds true.

    I feel like I've done this more by intuition than by mathematical method, and I can't show that these are the only values for which the vectors are perpendicular (though I suspect they are).

    There must be a better way to go about this, and I have a feeling it may be with some trig identity.

    In short, have I got all the values? Is there a better way to do it?

    Many thanks.
    The equation you solving is 2.Cos(2t).Sin(2t) - 4.Cos(t).Sin(t)=0.

    Dividing both sides by 2 and applying the double angle formula in reverse:

    \cos (2t) \sin (2t) - \sin(2t) = 0 \Rightarrow \sin (2t) (\cos (2t) - 1) = 0.

    It follows that either \sin (2t) = 0 or \cos (2t) - 1 = 0 .....
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Joined
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by mr fantastic View Post
    The equation you solving is 2.Cos(2t).Sin(2t) - 4.Cos(t).Sin(t)=0.

    Dividing both sides by 2 and applying the double angle formula in reverse:

    \cos (2t) \sin (2t) - \sin(2t) = 0 \Rightarrow \sin (2t) (\cos (2t) - 1) = 0.

    It follows that either \sin (2t) = 0 or \cos (2t) - 1 = 0 .....
    Thanks for that, but I now have a similar related problem!

    I have to show a particle will pass through the origin twice in the time period (0<t<2pi), it's position described by the vector:

    Sin(2t)i + 2cos(t)j = 0 (0<t<2pi), i and j are the unit vectors.

    If I plot Sin(2t) and Cos(t), I see that this is at t=pi/2, t=3pi/2. This makes sense, the particle can only be at the origin if the i and j components are zero.

    But if I try to solve as you showed above, I use the double angle formula and my equation becomes:

    2Sin(t)Cos(t)i + 2Cos(t)j =0

    I'm going to drop the i and j, I can't really justify it, but I don't think it matters, and I write:

    2Cos(t){Sin(t)+1}=0

    So, Cos(t) =0 at pi/2 and 3pi/2 (what I see from my trace)

    Sin(t)+1 =0

    Sin(t)=-1 t=3pi/4, t=7pi/4 !

    How have I managed to come up with this false answer?

    TF
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Flow Master
    mr fantastic's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    Zeitgeist
    Posts
    16,948
    Thanks
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Taylor Fylde View Post
    Thanks for that, but I now have a similar related problem!

    I have to show a particle will pass through the origin twice in the time period (0<t<2pi), it's position described by the vector:

    Sin(2t)i + 2cos(t)j = 0 (0<t<2pi), i and j are the unit vectors.

    If I plot Sin(2t) and Cos(t), I see that this is at t=pi/2, t=3pi/2. This makes sense, the particle can only be at the origin if the i and j components are zero.

    But if I try to solve as you showed above, I use the double angle formula and my equation becomes:

    2Sin(t)Cos(t)i + 2Cos(t)j =0

    I'm going to drop the i and j, I can't really justify it, but I don't think it matters, and I write:

    2Cos(t){Sin(t)+1}=0

    So, Cos(t) =0 at pi/2 and 3pi/2 (what I see from my trace)

    Sin(t)+1 =0

    Sin(t)=-1 t=3pi/4, t=7pi/4 !

    How have I managed to come up with this false answer?

    TF
    Sin(2t)i + 2cos(t)j = 0i + 0j (0<t<2pi)

    You require that both i and j components are zero simultaneously:

    i component: sin(2t) = 0 => 2 sin(t) cos(t) = 0 .... (1)

    j-component: 2 cos(t) = 0 .... (2)

    Clearly the simultaneous solution to (1) and (2) is cos(t) = 0 => t = pi/2, 3pi/2.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Joined
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by mr fantastic View Post
    Sin(2t)i + 2cos(t)j = 0i + 0j (0<t<2pi)

    You require that both i and j components are zero simultaneously:

    i component: sin(2t) = 0 => 2 sin(t) cos(t) = 0 .... (1)

    j-component: 2 cos(t) = 0 .... (2)

    Clearly the simultaneous solution to (1) and (2) is cos(t) = 0 => t = pi/2, 3pi/2.
    Now this, is quality service :-)

    Many thanks, I could see my answer from the trace was correct, but couldn't see why my second method didn't agree.

    Many thanks, I've been puzzling over this for a few days now.

    TF
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Integral (finished--need someone to check!)
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: January 25th 2011, 03:42 PM
  2. finished goods
    Posted in the Business Math Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 10th 2009, 05:52 PM
  3. int by parts(almost finished)
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 22nd 2009, 03:58 PM
  4. Finished - but is it Right (ODE)??
    Posted in the Calculus Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: September 27th 2008, 05:42 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum