Can't go wrong with the fraction. The 5.3 is an approximation, the fraction is exact. I prefer to be as exact as possible
A question about "correctness"
Given a question that asks the student to find the sum to infinity of a recurring decimal and the answer is 5.3(repeater) would you be happy to accept 5.3 repeater or would you prefer to see 16/6 or 51/3?
Neither 16/6 (= 2.6...) nor 51/3 (= 17) give the other answer, perhaps you meant 16/3 or they were just other examples.
Of course, 16/3 is exact, but so is 5.3... (where the dots effectively denote an infinite decimal expansion), also noted . If you just write a finite number of decimals such as 5.3 of 5.333, the anwer is an approximation.
I would prefer 16/3, but if the student makes clear that he means an infinite recurring decimal, the answer is not wrong and should not be marked wrong (imho), unless it was explicitly said (by the teacher, in class of before the test) that a fractional answer was the preferred form.
Just a quick comment to prove that I have a psychological need to be contrary...Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker
The preceeding comments go for Math. In Physics, don't try to give either a repeating decimal answer or a fraction. The whole significant digits thing really doesn't work well for fractional answers. For example: 17/3 = 6 because 3 only has one significant digit.
One of my favorite songs is to sing "100 Bottles of Beer on the Wall" to the correct number of sig figs! (Hint to the joke: 100 - 1 = 100.)
Okay! Okay! So I'm a dork!
Originally Posted by topsquark
The mathematics version goes like this.Originally Posted by topsquark
"Aleph-Null bottles of beer on the wall,
Aleph-Null bottles of beer,
Pass one around and drink it down,
Aleph-Nulls bottles of bear on the wall.