It is hard to say what you might be doing wrong when you don't say what you are doing!

I see "20x" so is "x" then is the number of "$20 increases"? Then the revenue from each unit is 400+ 20x and the number of apartments rented is 100- x.

So, yes, the total revenue is (400+ 2x)(100- x)= 40000- 1600x+ x^2[/tex]

You have an extra "0" here. Although you do not say it, you have taken the derivative of the revenue function. That would be 1600- 40x, not 16000- 40x.40,000+1600x-20x^2

16000-40x

Setting the derivative equal to 0, and solving for x gives x= 40, not 400. Maximum revenue comes when there are 40 "$20 increases in monthly rent" which would mean each apartment rents for 400+ 20(40)= $1200 so that you rent 100- 40= 60 apartments for total revenue 60(1200)= $72000.x=400

No, it doesn't. .completing the square method:

(x+40)^2+400

Completing the square on .

The graph of that is a parabola which has vertex at x= 40, y= 400. But it is the "x= 40" that is the number of "$20 increases", NOT the "y= 400".

both yield 400 as answer which would make max rent 8400 which is incorrect. IS my formula wrong? Where did i go wrong[/QUOTE]

No, both yield 40, not 400, as the answer which makes the rent on each apartment $1200