Logarithm Doubling question

Hey there,My questions state

Solve algebraically without using logarithms (1/8)^2x = 16^x-5

And : a population of bacteria in a glass of milk on the counter is quadrupling every half an hour

A) write a function for growth p(t) where t is in hours

B) now t in minutes

For a I got p(.5)=A(4)^t(.5) I put .5 because it's in hours so half of one

for B I got p(30)=a(4)^t/30

please help!!

Re: Logarithm Doubling question

I haven't done this kind of thing in a while, but let's see ...

Without using logarithms, convert everything to powers of 2,

You should be able to set the exponents equal and solve for x. As for the others, I'll post again as soon as I can work out the Latex, but if the population quadruples in half an hour, won't it increase 16 fold in a whole hour?

Re: Logarithm Doubling question

Quote:

Originally Posted by

**Gurp925** Solve algebraically without using logarithms (1/8)^2x = 16^x-5

That can be written as

Re: Logarithm Doubling question

If is population as a function of time, and t is in hours, and the population increases 16 fold in an hour, and is the population at time 0, then I'd think

If , what is ? If , what is ? Finally, if then what is ?

If t is in minutes, then you have to figure out what to put in the place of the 16. Let x be the number we want ....

But like I said, I haven't done this in a while. I might be wrong.

Re: Logarithm Doubling question

Im sorry zhandele i really do not understand your second post its a little confusing, is there any way you could simplify your answer?

I do however get my answer for the problem stated by Plato

Re: Logarithm Doubling question

I'm not sure where the difficulty is. Could you tell me what isn't clear?

Let's see. The problem doesn't say how many bacteria there are "to start with," and it doesn't give a time when the bacteria start to multiply. But we have to start from some time, with some number of bacteria. Let's call the start time

Are you with me so far? Now let's call the number of bacteria we have "to start with"

Maybe this well help. Suppose

This means that the population or number of bacteria at time zero is 100. And we know that a half hour later, we have four times as many, so if we measure time in hours then

and if we're measuring time in minutes, then

After a second half-hour, these numbers would quadruple again. Is that clear? So in hours

and in minutes

What we're doing is multiplying the initial population, which we don't know, by 16 fold for each hour that passes. The number of hours is the variable t in

By I mean "p as a function of t."

If we measure t in minutes, then

Is that better? Is it clear why I divided the t by 60? Substitute in t = 60 (for one hour, 60 minutes) or t = 30 (for one half hour, 30 minutes) and see what happens.

Basically, I'm converting hours into minutes by dividing by 60. I would also take the 60th root of 16, then raise to the t power. That would give an equivalent result, but it would appear as a decimal approximation.