Hi

I got the following question:

make y the subject of the following:

ln(x) + ln(y) = 0

This is what I have done so far, could someone help please?:

ln(x) + ln(y) = 0

ln(y) = -ln(x)

e^(ln(y) = e^(-ln(x))

y = e^(-ln(x))

Does that seem right?

Printable View

- Oct 22nd 2007, 11:55 PMtaurusln
Hi

I got the following question:

make y the subject of the following:

ln(x) + ln(y) = 0

This is what I have done so far, could someone help please?:

ln(x) + ln(y) = 0

ln(y) = -ln(x)

e^(ln(y) = e^(-ln(x))

y = e^(-ln(x))

Does that seem right? - Oct 23rd 2007, 12:03 AMCaptainBlack
- Oct 23rd 2007, 12:09 AMtaurus
so basically:

e^(-ln(x)) = 1/x

? - Oct 23rd 2007, 12:13 AMJhevon
why was writing both sides in base e necessary? could we have just droped the logs when appropriate?

OR

Oh well, I guess it was just a matter of taste - Oct 23rd 2007, 12:14 AMJhevon