Ok, I'm having some issues with these questions. So could you show me step by step on how to come to an answer.

1. write as a single logarithm in simplest form

(Log 16x^8)/4 - (Log 27x)/3

2. isolate x using laws of logarithims

3 Logx(4)=2

Printable View

- December 10th 2012, 08:54 AMTwinkieLogs :(
Ok, I'm having some issues with these questions. So could you show me step by step on how to come to an answer.

1. write as a single logarithm in simplest form

(Log 16x^8)/4 - (Log 27x)/3

2. isolate x using laws of logarithims

3 Logx(4)=2 - December 10th 2012, 09:54 AMtopsquarkRe: Logs :(
I'm afraid that I don't understand the final goal: "simplest form." So I'll show you how I would do the problem and you can make your own decision if the answer is simple enough.

We're going to be using the change of base formula:

I'm going to choose my favorite base, e.

So

Skipping a couple of steps, you should arrive at

Which has the final form, as simply as I can write it:

The only other thing I can think of would be to subtract the fractions.

-Dan - December 10th 2012, 09:57 AMtopsquarkRe: Logs :(
- December 10th 2012, 10:14 AMTwinkieRe: Logs :(
Ok thankyou for your help. :)

- December 10th 2012, 02:44 PMbjhopperRe: Logs :(
1. log 16x^8/4 - log27x/3

2.log4x^8 - log 9x

3.log4x^8/9x

4.log 4/9x^7 - December 10th 2012, 06:15 PMTwinkieRe: Logs :(
That kind of question makes sence now, but I have anouther question that I'm not sure how to do.

Solve.

3log(6) X= log(6) 9+ log(6) 24 - December 10th 2012, 06:31 PMtopsquarkRe: Logs :(
- December 10th 2012, 06:36 PMtopsquarkRe: Logs :(
If the bases on all the logs are the same then we can do this rather easily. Let's get everything to one side:

Let's rewrite that first term:

Now we can use

and

(Note: These are only true when the base a is the same on all log functions.)

Can you finish from here?

-Dan - December 10th 2012, 07:36 PMbjhopperRe: Logs :(
- December 10th 2012, 08:22 PMbjhopperRe: Logs :(
- December 11th 2012, 09:34 AMTwinkieRe: Logs :(
Ok thanks! :)