Printable View
Hi, I'm stuck on these problems, help is appreciated. Thank you. 1. Is there an for which exists? 2. 3.
Quote: Originally Posted by Grundsatz Hi, I'm stuck on these problems, help is appreciated. Thank you. 1. Is there an for which exists? 2. 3. For 1. the denominator is . To be able to evaluate the limit, you need to be able to cancel in the numerator. So has to be a factor. Using the factor theorem, will have as a factor if . So we have So in order for to exist, .
Quote: Originally Posted by Grundsatz 1. Is there an for which exists? Hint: so can you get rid of . How can you do that? Quote: Originally Posted by Grundsatz 2. Try factorizing , do they have a common factor? Quote: Originally Posted by Grundsatz 3. This one is easy if you get the first two.
Quote: Originally Posted by Grundsatz Hi, I'm stuck on these problems, help is appreciated. Thank you. 1. Is there an for which exists? 2. 3.
Quote: Originally Posted by Grundsatz Hi, I'm stuck on these problems, help is appreciated. Thank you. 1. Is there an for which exists? 2. 3. 3. Rationalising the numerator gives