and your work is correct.

Results 1 to 5 of 5

- January 14th 2012, 05:25 PM #1

- January 14th 2012, 05:56 PM #2

- Joined
- Apr 2008
- Posts
- 1,092

- January 14th 2012, 06:05 PM #3

- January 14th 2012, 10:59 PM #4

- January 15th 2012, 04:05 AM #5
## Re: ln and e

Thanks Quacky for taking the time to reply, that was what I was asking. Normally I'd see that, I assumed the rearrangment was some mysterious property of . All these new numbers are scaring the sense out of me , although it was very late, I have so got to get a grip.

Thanks again