Thread: Logs

Need some help to tell me what I'm doing wrong.

solve for y:

2e^(-y/3) = t + 4
ln(2e^(-y/3)) = ln(t+4)
-y/3(2) = ln(t+4)
y= -(3/2)ln(t+4)

ln(20-y) = -.2t + ln8
*Mult both sides by e
20-y = 8e^(-.2)
y= 20 - 8e^-.2

One thing at a time...



Try simple things first. Divide by 2



Now the logarithm.



Can you finish?

On the second, think really, REALLY hard about "multiply by e" to remove a logarithm. Until you see that this is very, VERY wrong, keep thinking about it.

I'll continue on the 2nd but for the first I just got y = -3ln((t+4)/2) Which I still think is wrong.

No, that's good, but it can be written a few other ways. Figure out how to get this one:



You should also worry about the Domain.

Originally Posted by crazycarlos61

Need some help to tell me what I'm doing wrong.

solve for y:

2e^(-y/3) = t + 4
ln(2e^(-y/3)) = ln(t+4)

Here is your error: ln(ab)= ln(a)+ ln(b), NOT a ln(b). ln (2e^{-y/3})= ln(2)+ ln(e^{-y/3})= ln(2)- y/3, not "-y/3(2)". To solve for y, you would then subtract ln(2) from both sides which would give you a factor of 2 in the denominator inside the logarithm. That is, this is the same as first dividing both side by 2 as TKHunny suggested.

-y/3(2) = ln(t+4)
y= -(3/2)ln(t+4)

ln(20-y) = -.2t + ln8
*Mult both sides by e

NO! Not "multiply both sides by e". Take "e to the power of both sides" or "take the exponential of both sides."
What you did is correct but thinking "multiply" when you don't mean that will lead you into errors eventually.

20-y = 8e^(-.2)
y= 20 - 8e^-.2

What happened to the "t"? exp(-.2t+ ln(8))= exp(-.2t)(8)