I'm not getting the algebric trick to do this limit, when
In a similar question i did the taylor expansion with 2 terms:for
, and it worked fine (i that case
). Probably i'll have to use the same in here.
Thank's.


"x>> a" is the same as saying that x goes to 0 (as compared to a).
Start by rationalizing the numerator of the fraction inside the ln by multiplying both numerator and denominator by.
Now, both numerator and denominator of the argument go to 0 as x goes to 0 so we can use L'hopital's rule:differentiate both, with respect to x. The derivative of the numerator is 2x. The derivative of the denominator is. The numerator and denominator still go to 0, as x goes to 0, so we use L'Hopital again.
The derivative of 2x is 2. The derivative of [tex]2x+ 2ax(a^2+ x^2)^{-1/2}[tex] is. The first, of course, goes to 2 while the second goes to
as x goes to 0.