I'm having trouble solving the following:
3x^2 / x^3+14x^2+65x+100
I don't know what to do with the constant 100. So far i have obtained for the denominator, x(x^2+14x+65)+100 but unsure what to do for the next step.
I'm having trouble solving the following:
3x^2 / x^3+14x^2+65x+100
I don't know what to do with the constant 100. So far i have obtained for the denominator, x(x^2+14x+65)+100 but unsure what to do for the next step.
That's not how you factorise the denominator.
Find the positive and negative factors of and substitute each of them into the polynomial in the denominator.
If any of these factors, call it , makes the polynomial , then is a factor.
Once you have that factor of the polynomial, long divide and factorise whatever is left.
thank you people for helping me out. i google/youtube Horner's rule and confused myself more. they provide the definition but it makes no sense to me without a well explained example. could someone provide an example of Horner's rule-formula in action. btw, my precalculus class didn't mention horners rule so this is new to me.
check this one
YouTube - Horner Schema
or u would like to show u on this example how to use it ?
?
yeahhh all the horner schema videos are in german and i have no clue what's happening lol. i do know how to solve a partial fraction decomposition problem once the denominator/numerator is factored if needed.
what isn't so clear is how the denominator was factored for my question. i can see the ans is right but i would like to know how was the formula of horner schema (which isn't clear to me due to videos and the complicated definition of it) used to solve my question.
Factorisation of polynomials is a technique all of itself. If you're out here in the areas of mathematics where partial fraction expansion is needed, then you ought to be confident at factorisation. I can't immediately lay my hands on a manual which will give you lots of practice at it, I recommend you ask your teacher / mentor / tutor to point you towards some sources.
The first thing we did when I started my A-level mathematics (that's equivalent of American upper high-school, I believe) was spend a week or two doing nothing but factorise ever more complicated polynomials. Wow. I was in heaven, I can tell you - for the first time in my life I was able to do mathematics for hours on end, all day in fact, on occasion.
let's say it like this (sorry for late response, i was to busy)
if u have and u need it to divide it with u'll get something like this ( not something, this u'll get )
to calculate u can use Horner's scheme
okay let's say now u need to divide
with
now u'll have that your because of this and
, , , , ,
and now as u see these and so on are coefficients...
now u can make a Horner's scheme...
so u get that :
now if u want to let's say find zeros... U have something like
and u need to find zeros. U'll do it like this
if equation like this one have a rational root where then is divisor of free member, and is divisor of coefficient with highest level ...
so for our we have :
and so it's
and
now u need to check first zero meaning that u put those solutions and see for which will be R=0
so u have first zero and now u can use scheme so u don't have R any more
so u have now that :
u can continue using Horner's schema or quadratic formula since u got these what we got
now if u need let's say to express by the again u can use Horner's schema ....
it's same procedure like before so i'll just put table hope u'll get it
and finally u got :
hope i helped if not, say where's the problem
@yeKciM
for the following: "and now as u see these and so on are coefficients...
now u can make a Horner's scheme... "
i understand how you got a_0 through a_5.
im not sure on this part. you wrote " b_0 - a_1 ". b_0 =2 , a_1 = -6 therefore 2 - (-6) = 8. so then what makes sense to me to get your ans (which is b_1=4) is the following:
x_1 =5 , b_0=2 so 5*2 = 10. 10-(-6) = 16 =/= 4.
im not sure how to find b_2=9. the formula says x_1(b_1) - a_2= so we have 5*4 = 20 - (-17) = 37.
a_2 = -17
i understand this part:
so u have first zero and now u can use scheme so u don't have R any more
i understand how you obtained row (1,-1,2,-2,0,5) but not the ones thereafter-- im completely lost for those remaining.
I corrected those few errors up there sorry... I't was pretty late here when i done that
(it's not minus....
as for that last one u do it the same way as u done that one (u say u understand) it's just when u get that row (1,-1,2,-2,5) that numbers will be your and then u do work for next row and so on ... when u do each row your are the row above that one u are working on and after u finish just take numbers from the diagonal and ur done
sorry again for bad typo