Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Polynomial roots

  1. #1
    Super Member
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    715

    Polynomial roots

    I've just noticed that every polynomial of degree 2k+1, with k \ne 0, has to at least have one real root (because complex numbers happen in pairs).
    This is true, right? It's shown in my A-level textbook that if z = x+iy is a root of a polynomial equation with real coefficients, then z = x-iy is
    also a root of the polynomial equation. But I doubt showing just that would be sufficient. How can it be shown?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    From
    Florida
    Posts
    3,093
    Thanks
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCoffeeMachine View Post
    I've just noticed that every polynomial of degree 2k+1, with k \ne 0, has to at least have one real root (because complex numbers happen in pairs).
    This is true, right? It's shown in my A-level textbook that if z = x+iy is a root of a polynomial equation with real coefficients, then z = x-iy is
    also a root of the polynomial equation. But I doubt showing just that would be sufficient. How can it be shown?
    2k+1 is odd; therefore, [iMATH]x^{2k+1}[/iMATH] must have at least one real solution. Actually induction may work here.

    For roots of the polynomial, we only have 2 options either x\in\mathbb{R} or x\in\mathbb{C}. If x\in\mathbb{C}, then x=a\pm b\mathbf{i}.
    Last edited by dwsmith; May 13th 2010 at 03:04 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Super Member
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    715
    Quote Originally Posted by dwsmith View Post
    2k+1 is odd; therefore, x^{2k+1} must have at least one real solution.
    But your conclusion is exactly what I'm trying to prove. I've noticed it while sketching odd
    degree polynomials, but I have written it in that way (because I thought it might be better).
    And thanks, I don't know I was thinking when I put the restriction that  k\ne 0.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    MHF Contributor
    Joined
    Mar 2010
    From
    Florida
    Posts
    3,093
    Thanks
    4
    Since complex answers come in pairs, they are of the form 2p which is even.

    x^{2p+1}=x^{2p}x

    The roots of x^{2p} are complex.

    Since x is of degree 1, x must be a real solution.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    MHF Contributor Drexel28's Avatar
    Joined
    Nov 2009
    From
    College Park, Maryland
    Posts
    4,542
    Thanks
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCoffeeMachine View Post
    I've just noticed that every polynomial of degree 2k+1, with k \ne 0, has to at least have one real root (because complex numbers happen in pairs).
    This is true, right? It's shown in my A-level textbook that if z = x+iy is a root of a polynomial equation with real coefficients, then z = x-iy is
    also a root of the polynomial equation. But I doubt showing just that would be sufficient. How can it be shown?
    Hello friend,

    Your hypothesis is true. Namely that if p(x)=\alpha_{2n+1} x^{2n+1}+\cdots+\alpha_0,\text{ }n\geqslant 1 then p(x)=0 for some x\in\mathbb{R}

    There are many proofs of this. One, as you mentioned is that by the fundamental theorem of algebra p:\mathbb{C}\to\mathbb{C} has exactly 2n+1 zeros (counting multiplicity), \alpha_0,\cdots,\alpha_{2n+1}\in\mathbb{R} then we know that p(x)=(x-\beta_1)\cdots(x-\beta_{2n+1}),\text{ }\beta_{1}\cdots,\beta_{2n+1}\in\mathbb{C}. Now, it is fairly easy to show that if all of the betas are non-real that p must have an imaginary coefficient contradictory to our hypothesis. Thus, p must have a real zero.

    Thinking more along the lines of analysis p:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R} is continuous. But, clearly (why?) \lim_{x\to\infty}p(x)=-\lim_{x\to-\infty}p(x) and thus p(x)<0 at some point and p(x)>0 at some point and the intermediate value theorem implies the existence of a zero.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #6
    Flow Master
    mr fantastic's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    Zeitgeist
    Posts
    16,953
    Thanks
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by TheCoffeeMachine View Post
    I've just noticed that every polynomial of degree 2k+1, with k \ne 0, has to at least have one real root (because complex numbers happen in pairs).
    This is true, right? It's shown in my A-level textbook that if z = x+iy is a root of a polynomial equation with real coefficients, then z = x-iy is
    also a root of the polynomial equation. But I doubt showing just that would be sufficient. How can it be shown?
    It is easily proved using the Intermediate Value Theorem.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. roots of i, polynomial
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 28th 2011, 06:08 AM
  2. Polynomial Roots
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: September 23rd 2010, 11:20 PM
  3. Polynomial Roots
    Posted in the Differential Geometry Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 1st 2010, 09:10 PM
  4. polynomial roots
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: September 1st 2009, 12:30 PM
  5. Roots of a polynomial.
    Posted in the Math Topics Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 6th 2008, 11:49 AM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum