# Math Help - Functions as equations

1. ## Functions as equations

Is sentence "the equation is a function" the shorthand of saying "the equation defines a function"?

2. It's the expression:

$f(x) = some-expression$

$f(x) = x^2$ is, for example, the equation of a quadratic function.

3. Hello mamen
Originally Posted by mamen
Is sentence "the equation is a function" the shorthand of saying "the equation defines a function"?
Yes, I expect so, but I should like to see the whole context before being sure.

It's rather sloppy, though, to say "The equation is a function", because equations and functions are different things. A function, $f$, say, is a relation between the elements of one set (the domain) and the elements of another set (the codomain) which has the property that every element in the domain is related with just one element in the codomain. If $x$ denotes an element in the domain, then $f(x)$ is used to denote the element in the codomain that's related to it.

If we now introduce a second variable, $y$, say, to stand for the element in the codomain that's related to $x$, then we can write the equation:
$y = f(x)$
and say that this equation "defines" the function. But it's not technically correct to say that this equation "is" the function.

Hello mamenYes, I expect so, but I should like to see the whole context before being sure.

It's rather sloppy, though, to say "The equation is a function", because equations and functions are different things. A function, $f$, say, is a relation between the elements of one set (the domain) and the elements of another set (the codomain) which has the property that every element in the domain is related with just one element in the codomain. If $x$ denotes an element in the domain, then $f(x)$ is used to denote the element in the codomain that's related to it.

If we now introduce a second variable, $y$, say, to stand for the element in the codomain that's related to $x$, then we can write the equation:
$y = f(x)$
and say that this equation "defines" the function. But it's not technically correct to say that this equation "is" the function.

Hi sir,

Actually the book just says that the equation f(x)= x+2 is a function.

that's why ,I think, it is the shorthand of saying that the equation f(x) =x+2 defines the function.

thanks sir

5. Hello mamen
Originally Posted by mamen
Hi sir,

Actually the book just says that the equation f(x)= x+2 is a function.

that's why ,I think, it is the shorthand of saying that the equation f(x) =x+2 defines the function.

thanks sir
I agree with you - it does mean the equation $f(x) = x+2$ defines a function.

However, it would also be correct to say that this equation also defines a straight line graph. But an equation and a graph are not the same thing. So it wouldn't technically be correct to say that the equation $f(x) = x+2$ is a straight line, would it?

And, as I said, an equation and a function are not the same thing either. So, personally, I should try to avoid saying that an equation is a function, just as I should avoid saying that an equation is a straight line.

Hello mamenI agree with you - it does mean the equation $f(x) = x+2$ defines a function.

However, it would also be correct to say that this equation also defines a straight line graph. But an equation and a graph are not the same thing. So it wouldn't technically be correct to say that the equation $f(x) = x+2$ is a straight line, would it?

And, as I said, an equation and a function are not the same thing either. So, personally, I should try to avoid saying that an equation is a function, just as I should avoid saying that an equation is a straight line.

Lastly sir,

When we say that a "certain equation defines a function", would it also mean that this equation is used to constitute the function.
The same thing with the statement "the equation also defines a straight line graph." Does this also mean that the equation is used to constitute the straight line graph?

thanks sir!

7. Hello mamen
Originally Posted by mamen
Lastly sir,

When we say that a "certain equation defines a function", would it also mean that this equation is used to constitute the function.
The same thing with the statement "the equation also defines a straight line graph." Does this also mean that the equation is used to constitute the straight line graph?

thanks sir!
My dictionary defines to constitute as "to set up or establish", so I suppose you could say that an equation "constitutes" a function, in exactly the same way as it "defines" a function.

Hello mamenMy dictionary defines to constitute as "to set up or establish", so I suppose you could say that an equation "constitutes" a function, in exactly the same way as it "defines" a function.

Thanks a lot sir,
But what do we mean by "a function expressed or represented by an equation."
Is there such thing as that?

9. Hello mamen
Originally Posted by mamen
Thanks a lot sir,
But what do we mean by "a function expressed or represented by an equation."
Is there such thing as that?
Again, these are different English words - "expressed", "represented" - which have similar meanings to the ones you have already asked about. So, yes, you could say that an equation "expresses" a function, or "represents" a function, in just the same way as an equation "defines" a function.

10. In my humble opinion a lot of math books consider functions to be a relation across the domain and codomain. In other words a function $f:X\mapsto Y$ is really just a set $R\subseteq X\times Y$ with the defining characterstic $R=\left\{(x,y)\in X\times Y:y=f(x)\right\}$ where $f(x)$ is the rule of correspondence.

In my humble opinion a lot of math books consider functions to be a relation across the domain and codomain. In other words a function $f:X\mapsto Y$ is really just a set $R\subseteq X\times Y$ with the defining characterstic $R=\left\{(x,y)\in X\times Y:y=f(x)\right\}$ where $f(x)$ is the rule of correspondence.
It is just worth stressing that, for a given $x$, $y$ is unique. In other words, if $y_1= f(x)$ and $y_2 = f(x)$, then $y_1 = y_2$. This is what distinguishes a function from a more general relation, where we may have two different $y$'s each related to the same $x$.