Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 56
Like Tree4Thanks

Math Help - Mathematics - a new basis

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Mathematics - a new basis

    I switched on your recommendation-​-Dan
    See a picture that represents the relations of the two triangles


    what is a "?"
    3?3=3
    3?3=4
    3?3=5
    3?3=6
    3?3=7
    3?3=8
    3?3=9
    3?3=10
    3?3=12
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    When you look at the solution below will not be clear
    1. 3 + [0] 3 = 3
    2. 3 + [1] 3 = 4
    3. 3 + [2] 3 = 5
    4. 3 + [3] 3 = 6 or 3 +3 = 6
    5.33Rd1 (6) d2 (7) +3 = 7
    6.33Rd1 (6) d2 (8) +3 = 8
    7.33Rd1 (6) d2 (9) +3 = 9
    8.33Rd1 (6) d2 (10) +3 = 10
    9.33Rd1 (6) d2 (12) +3 = 12
    (1,2,3,4) - There are many forms of addition in the set N
    (5,6,7,8,9) - numbers that are dynamic, where it is possible to add this
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    1 Mathematics Space
    We'll tell mathematical space with two initial geometric object that can not
    prove.
    1.Natural geometric object - natural straight line .
    2.Real geometric objects - real straight lines .
    1.1 Natural along
    In the picture there is a natural geometric object straight line (AB), it has a beginning (A)
    and end (B) - this property natural long'll call point.

    Mathematics - a new basis-w1.png

    1.2 The basic rule
    Two (more) natural straight line are connected only with points.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    2 Natural Mathematics
    2.1 straight line , semi-line "1"
    "1"-from any previous evidence (axioms), a new proof
    Theorem-Two (more) natural straight line merge points in the direction of the first AB
    natural straight line .

    EVIDENCE - natural straight lines (AB, BC) are connected - we get straight line AC.

    Mathematics - a new basis-w2.png

    Natural straight lines (AB, BC, CD) are connected - we get straight line AD.

    Mathematics - a new basis-w3.png

    Natural straight lines (AB, BC, CD, DE) are connected - we get straight line AE.

    Mathematics - a new basis-w4.png
    ...

    Natural straight lines (AB, BC, CD, DE, ...) are connected - getting semi-line.

    Mathematics - a new basis-w5.png
    -------------
    Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
    straight line - EVIDENCE ( line - Axiom)
    semi-line - EVIDENCE (line -Axiom )
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,412
    Thanks
    1328

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    I am confused as to what is "new" about this. It looks to me like basic Euclidean geometry but with vague and poorly stated definitions instead of the standard definitions.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Quote Originally Posted by HallsofIvy View Post
    I am confused as to what is "new" about this. It looks to me like basic Euclidean geometry but with vague and poorly stated definitions instead of the standard definitions.
    Geometry but not the basis of the whole of mathematics, unlike Euclid I only have two axioms (natural straight line - with which you are familiar)
    This is a different approach than the current math, the fewer rules (axiom)
    Because these rules (axioms) to limit the the phenomena that exist in real life can be mathematically explained (I gave an example of the early post)
    ------------
    2.2 Numeral semi-line, numeric point "2.1"
    Theorem-character mark points on the one-way infinite
    long (A, B, C, ...), replace the labels {(0), (0.1), ..., (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 ), ...}
    which are set circular and positionally.
    Mathematics - a new basis-w6.png
    Proof - is obtained by numerical along which the numerical point of {(0,00,000,
    0000, ...), (​​0,1,10,11,100,101, ...), ..., (0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11, 12, ...), ...}.
    -------------
    2.3 Natural numbers "2.2"
    Theorem - There is a relationship (length) between Point in numeric (0) and
    all points Numeral semi-line.

    Proof - Value (length) numeric point (0) and numerical point (0)
    the number 0

    Mathematics - a new basis-w7.png

    Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (1) the number o1

    Mathematics - a new basis-w8.png

    Ratio (required) numeric point (0) and numeric item (2) is the number 2

    Mathematics - a new basis-w9.png

    Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (3) is the number 3

    Mathematics - a new basis-w10.png

    Ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (4) is the number 4

    Mathematics - a new basis-w11.png
    ...
    Set - all the possibilities given theorem.
    The set of natural numbers N = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, ...}.
    --------
    Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
    numeral semi-line - axiom
    numerical point - axiom
    set - axiom
    natural numbers -axion
    Last edited by msbiljanica; February 12th 2013 at 11:16 PM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    2.4 Mobile Number "2.2,2.3"
    Theorem-Natural numbers can be specified and other numerical
    point other than the point numeric 0th
    Proof - Value (length) numeric point (0) and numeric point (2)
    the number 2
    Mathematics - a new basis-w12.png
    Ratio (length) numeric point (1) and the numerical point of (3) is the number 2
    Mathematics - a new basis-w13.png
    Ratio (length) numerical point (2) and the numerical point of (4) is the number 2
    Mathematics - a new basis-w14.png
    ...
    A set of mobile numbers Nn = {[n]N}
    -----------------
    2.5 Gap numbers "2.2,2.3,2.4"
    Theorem - Natural number and mobile number of no contact,
    (natural number and mobile number no contact) and have no contact mobile number, ..., in numeric longer.

    EVIDENCE - natural number 2 and mobile number 2 no contact, you get the number of gaps 2/.1/2.
    Mathematics - a new basis-w15.png
    natural number 2 and mobile number 2 no contact, you get the number of gaps 2/.2/2.
    Mathematics - a new basis-w16.png
    natural number 2 and mobile number 2 no contact, you get the number of gaps 2/.3/2.
    Mathematics - a new basis-w17.png
    ...
    (natural number 2 and mobile number 2 no contact) and mobile number 1 no contact , you get the number of gaps
    2/.1/2/.1/1
    Mathematics - a new basis-w18.png
    ...
    Set gap number GN={a|/.bn/cn|(a,bn,cn) \in N,bn>0}
    a/.b1/c1
    a/.b1/c1/.b2/c2
    a/.b1/c1/.b2/c2/.b3/c3
    a/.b1/c1/.b2/c2/.b3/c3/.b4/c4
    ...
    ---------
    Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
    mobile number - no
    gap number - no
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    2.6. Mobile gap number "2.2,2.5"
    Theorem-Gap numbers can be entered and the second numerical
    point other than the point numeric 0th

    EVIDENCE-ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (4) is
    2/.1/1 number of gap.

    Mathematics - a new basis-w19.png

    ratio (length) numeric point (1) and the numerical point of (5) is
    2/.1/1 number of gap.

    Mathematics - a new basis-w20.png

    ratio (length) numeric point (2) and the numerical point of (6) is
    2/.1/1 number of gap.
    Mathematics - a new basis-w21.png
    ...
    A set of mobile numbers gap GNn={[n]GN}
    -------------
    2.7. Points the number of "2.2,2.3,2.5"
    Theorem - Number (N,GN) has extended the numeric point, they
    can write the opposite.

    EVIDENCE - Number 5 has a point: [0], [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Opposite may
    write: [.0], [.1], [.2], [.3], [.4], [.5].

    Mathematics - a new basis-w22.png

    Gaps has a number 2/.3/1 points: [0], [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. They can be
    otherwise write: [.0], [.1], [.2], [.3], [.4], [.5), [.6].
    Mathematics - a new basis-w23.png
    --------------
    Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
    mobile gap number - no
    point number - no
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  9. #9
    Member
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    From
    Erewhon
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    108

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Quote Originally Posted by msbiljanica View Post
    2.6. Mobile gap number "2.2,2.5"
    Theorem-Gap numbers can be entered and the second numerical
    point other than the point numeric 0th

    EVIDENCE-ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (4) is
    2/.1/1 number of gap.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	w19.png 
Views:	0 
Size:	14.1 KB 
ID:	27023

    ratio (length) numeric point (1) and the numerical point of (5) is
    2/.1/1 number of gap.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	w20.png 
Views:	0 
Size:	14.2 KB 
ID:	27024

    ratio (length) numeric point (2) and the numerical point of (6) is
    2/.1/1 number of gap.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	w21.png 
Views:	0 
Size:	14.1 KB 
ID:	27025
    ...
    A set of mobile numbers gap GNn={[n]GN}
    -------------
    2.7. Points the number of "2.2,2.3,2.5"
    Theorem - Number (N,GN) has extended the numeric point, they
    can write the opposite.

    EVIDENCE - Number 5 has a point: [0], [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Opposite may
    write: [.0], [.1], [.2], [.3], [.4], [.5].

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	w22.png 
Views:	0 
Size:	24.8 KB 
ID:	27026

    Gaps has a number 2/.3/1 points: [0], [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. They can be
    otherwise write: [.0], [.1], [.2], [.3], [.4], [.5), [.6].
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	w23.png 
Views:	0 
Size:	39.3 KB 
ID:	27027
    --------------
    Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
    mobile gap number - no
    point number - no
    You a crank and I claim my $64,000 reward.

    .
    Thanks from topsquark
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Quote Originally Posted by zzephod View Post
    You a crank and I claim my $64,000 reward.

    .
    is this a joke, or actually give the money
    --------------
    2.8. The opposite number "2.2,2.3,2.5,2.7"
    Theorem - Numbers (N, GN) that have the same number of points
    number, length becomes gap and rotation.
    EVIDENCE - 4 \fbox{s} 0/.4/0 , 4s. = {4, 0/.4/0 } or 0/.4/0s.= {0/.4/0,4}.

    Mathematics - a new basis-w24.png

    1/.1/3 \fbox{s} 0/.1/1/.3/0 , 1/.1/3s. = {1/.1/3, 0/.1/1/.3/0} or
    0/.1/1/.3/0s. ={ 0/.1/1/.3/0, 1/.1/3}

    Mathematics - a new basis-w25.png

    The general form of a \fbox{s} b. as.= {a, b} or bs. = {b, a}.

    A set of numbers opposing S. = {(a, b) \in(N, GN)}, S.n = {(a, b)  \in (Nn, GNn)}
    ----------------
    2.9 N comparability numbers "2.3"
    Theorem - Two (more) numbers are comparable to
    know who is higher (equal or smaller), which is the point of [.0] away
    from the numerical point of 0th

    EVIDENCE - Two numbers: 5> 3 (item number 5 [5] is far from the point
    3 of [3] 5 is a number of third 4 = 4 (item number 4 [4] and the number of points
    4 [4] are equidistant) 4 is equal to 4 .2 <6 (item number 6 [6] is
    from the point of 2 [2] 2 less than sixth ). .(={>, =, <}.

    The general form of a). .(b

    Three numbers: a). .(b). .(c (general form, open, closed form (the
    figure)).

    Mathematics - a new basis-w26.png

    ...
    ---------------
    Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
    opposite number -no
    N comparability numbers - axiom
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    2:10 Adding "2.2,2.3,2.4,2.5,2.7,2.8"
    Theorem - Number (N, GN, S.) and number (Nn, GNn, Sn) have
    contact, item number (Nn, GNn, Sn) [0 ] ranges counts the number of
    (N, GN, S.) and connect.

    EVIDENCE - 3 + [0 ] 3 = 3 or 3 + [.3 ] 3 = 3.
    Mathematics - a new basis-w27.png
    3 + [1] 3 = 4 or 3 + [.2] 3 = 4
    Mathematics - a new basis-w28.png
    3+[2]3=5 or 3+[1]3=5
    Mathematics - a new basis-w29.png
    3+[3]3=6 or 3+[.0]3=6 or 3+3=6.
    Mathematics - a new basis-w30.png

    The general form of a + [q] = c or b + a [. q] b = c
    The general form of the opposite numbers
    Mathematics - a new basis-w31.png

    This is the solution to start fasting
    3+[0]3=3
    3+[1]3=4
    3+[2]3=5
    3+[3]3=6

    ------------------------
    2.11 comparability GN number "2.10"
    Theorem - Parts of gaps that are not /. an / are added
    actions in addition [.0] and compared as natural numbers.

    EVIDENCE - 4/.5/3 , 4+[.0]3=7 , a/.b/c , a+[.0]c=d .

    6/.5./2/.4/3 , 6+[.0]2+[.0]3=11 , a/.b/c/.d/e , a+[.0]c+[.0]e=f .

    3/.3/5/.2/7/.3/4 , 3+[.0]5+[.0]7+[.0]4=19 , a/.b/c/.d/e/.f/g ,
    a+[.0]c+[.0]e+[.0]g=h .

    ...
    -----------------------
    Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
    adding - axiom (one form)
    comparability GN number - no
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  12. #12
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,412
    Thanks
    1328

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Perhaps it is a translation problem but nothing you are saying makes any sense to me. What does it mean for two numbers to "have contact"? What does it mean for numbers to "connect"? What are "gaps"? What do you mean by "fasting"?
    Thanks from topsquark
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Quote Originally Posted by HallsofIvy View Post
    Perhaps it is a translation problem but nothing you are saying makes any sense to me. What does it mean for two numbers to "have contact"? What does it mean for numbers to "connect"? What are "gaps"? What do you mean by "fasting"?
    two numbers to "have contact"

    Mathematics - a new basis-11.png
    "gaps"

    Mathematics - a new basis-1.png
    current mathematics x\in(0,1)\cup(2,5) -1
    x\in(0,1)\cup(2,3)\cup(4,5)-2
    reason that if you write a formula for (1,2) to be less character,
    1/.1/3+[3] 1/.1/1/.1/1=1/.1/4/.1/1 - a+[q]b=c
    a= x_1\in(0,1)\cup(2,5)
    b= x_2\in(0,1)\cup(2,3)\cup(4,5)
    c= x\in(0,1)\cup(2,6)\cup(7,8)
    ​+[q]-continues, you'll see that a lot needs to be written

    "fasting" (look February 11th, 2013, 07:43 AM)
    -------------
    2.12 Subtraction "2.10"
    Theorem - The addition of a long relationship where the angle
    delete this relationship, the rest remains.

    Evidence - 3-[0]3=0 or 3-[.3]3=0 or3-3=0
    Mathematics - a new basis-w32.png
    3-[1]3=1/.2/1 or 3-[.2]=1/.2/1
    Mathematics - a new basis-w33.png
    3-[2]3=2/.1/2or 3-[.1]3=2/.1/2
    Mathematics - a new basis-w34.png
    3-[3]3=6 or3-[.0]3=6
    Mathematics - a new basis-w35.png
    The general form a-[q]b=c ili a-[.q]b=c

    The general form the opposite numbers
    Mathematics - a new basis-w36.png
    -----------
    TEST - see what you've learned
    (2.8 - what part of the question)
    1. 4/.3/2/.9/2s.=?
    2. 50s.=?
    3. 0/.22/5/.6/0=?
    (2.10)
    1. 5+[3]7=?
    2. 6s.+[.2]1/.4/5/.3/0=?
    3. 4/.5/3s.+[6]6/.2/3s.=?
    (2.11)
    1. 4/.6/3?1/.2/2/.2/1
    2. 5/.2/2/.3/1?1/.6/2
    3. 4/.3/2s.?6
    (2.12)
    1.6-[.2]7=?
    2.1/.6/2-[3]6s.=?
    3.7s.-[4]8s.=?
    Last edited by msbiljanica; February 18th 2013 at 09:46 AM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  14. #14
    Member
    Joined
    Apr 2012
    From
    Erewhon
    Posts
    164
    Thanks
    108

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    I am amazed at how polite many of the respondents to this thread have been to what is either nonsense or a complete failure on the part of the OP to communicate what he thinks s/he has to say effectively.

    .
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    2.13. Contrary subtract "2.10"
    Theorem - The addition of a long relationship where the angle
    this relationship remains, the rest of the care.

    Evidence 3 \fbox{-} [0]3=3 or 3 \fbox{-} [.3]3=3
    Mathematics - a new basis-w37.png
    3 \fbox{-} [1]3=2 or 3 \fbox{-} [.2]3=2
    Mathematics - a new basis-w38.png
    3 \fbox{-} [2]3=1 or 3 \fbox{-} [.1]3=1
    Mathematics - a new basis-w39.png
    3 \fbox{-} [3]3=0 or 3 \fbox{-} [.0]3=0
    Mathematics - a new basis-w40.png
    The general form a \fbox{-} [q]b=c or a \fbox{-} [.q]b=c
    The general form in opposite numbers
    Mathematics - a new basis-w41.png
    Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
    subtraction - axiom (one form)
    contrary subtract - no
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Mathematics - a new basis
    Posted in the Math Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: February 4th 2013, 05:58 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 16th 2012, 11:24 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: August 30th 2011, 04:48 PM
  4. Mathematics: Discrete-Mathematics (Algorithems)
    Posted in the Discrete Math Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November 2nd 2008, 06:27 AM
  5. Mathematics Of Degree (the New Mathematics !!!! )
    Posted in the Advanced Math Topics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 26th 2006, 07:35 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum