Uhhhh....Any number a (real or even complex) can be written as a/1. That's a variation on how the multiplicative identity is defined. What's your point?

-Dan

Printable View

- October 27th 2013, 04:14 PMtopsquarkRe: Mathematics - a new basis
- January 9th 2014, 11:30 PMphilip12Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Really challenging.....

- April 17th 2014, 05:51 AMmnkyRe: Mathematics - a new basis
You people are really receptive to new ideas. Even though these are hard to make sense of, everyone here really gave it a go. Cool community!

- April 17th 2014, 12:31 PMJeffMRe: Mathematics - a new basis
Ramanujan has much to answer for.

- May 1st 2014, 09:43 AMmsbiljanicaRe: Mathematics - a new basis
Here I am again

See the attached pdf and you will clearly

https://onedrive.live.com/view.aspx?...=WordPdf&wdo=1 - May 1st 2014, 11:27 AMHallsofIvyRe: Mathematics - a new basis
- May 1st 2014, 12:28 PMromsekRe: Mathematics - a new basis
- May 4th 2014, 10:38 AMmsbiljanicaRe: Mathematics - a new basis

When many stickler, bisection angle possible (by calculation), but when you measure accuracy - (n trillionth of a degree), then the resulting approximate angles (not the same, irrational), and therefore the bisection angle is impossible, it is indicative, as my trisecting ... - May 21st 2014, 02:21 AMmsbiljanicaRe: Mathematics - a new basis
- May 21st 2014, 07:22 AMHallsofIvyRe: Mathematics - a new basis
What is this about? What was your purpose in posting it? You talk about "division numbers" which appear to be one angle divided by another. (There is one slight error- 360

**degrees**divided by 54**degrees**is 6.6666... NOT "6.6666...**degrees**. The ratio of two numbers with the same dimensions is a "dimensionless number".) But I don't understand your point in posting it. You have labeled this "incomplete solution". "Solution" to**what**problem??? You should always state what problem you are attempting to solve prominently. - May 21st 2014, 04:57 PMtopsquarkRe: Mathematics - a new basis
Asked, answered, and too many changes in topic. Not to mention too many invalid statements. Not to mention a strong recommendation to read your Euclid, msbiljanica. etc.

Thread closed.

-Dan