Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 56
Like Tree4Thanks

Math Help - Mathematics - a new basis

  1. #31
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    k6-function opposite number - because each has its opposite number, the general form
    as.w [q] b = c, a w [q] bs. = c, as.w [q] bs. = c, (s.-tag number which has its opposite number)
    k7-Subtraction - one can only be in (a-yes ,b - not), or in the (b -yes ,a - not),
    2/.2/4-[1]3/.3/2=1/.1/5/.1/1 , current subtraction 5-2=3
    Mathematics - a new basis-7y.png
    Mathematics - a new basis-7yy.png
    ----------------
    topsquark show the current notation of what I have reposed (im my 35 characters)
    Mathematics - a new basis-qqqq.png
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #32
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,693
    Thanks
    1466

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    I am beginning to think this is all a joke. You have, again, given a lot of examples but have not given a single definition. Is there some reason why you refuse to tell us what you are talking about?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #33
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Quote Originally Posted by HallsofIvy View Post
    I am beginning to think this is all a joke. You have, again, given a lot of examples but have not given a single definition. Is there some reason why you refuse to tell us what you are talking about?
    you want my math to understand math as the present, mine is a different approach, there is no definition, two axioms (and no other definitions), everything has to be connected (no axiom that breaks connectivity)
    k7-Subtraction - 1 can only be in (a-yes ,b - not), or in the (b -yes ,a - not),
    2/.2/4-[1]3/.3/2=1/.1/5/.1/1 , current subtraction 5-2=3
    Mathematics - a new basis-6y.png
    Mathematics - a new basis-6yy.png
    Last edited by msbiljanica; March 7th 2013 at 07:18 AM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #34
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,693
    Thanks
    1466

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    If there are no definitions then there is nothing to talk about.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #35
    Forum Admin topsquark's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    From
    Wellsville, NY
    Posts
    9,933
    Thanks
    336
    Awards
    1

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Quote Originally Posted by HallsofIvy View Post
    If there are no definitions then there is nothing to talk about.
    I agree completely . And msbiljanica I asked you some time ago to post your paper rather than little snippets. I see no reason to continue the conversation.

    -Dan
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #36
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    k7-subtraction - there is only 1 u a (b - not), or just u b (a -not),
    2/.2/4- [1] = 3/.3/2 1/.1/5/.1/1, current subtraction 5-2 = 3
    Mathematics - a new basis-6y.png
    Mathematics - a new basis-6yy.png
    Last edited by msbiljanica; March 9th 2013 at 08:28 AM.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #37
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    k8-contrast subtraction - 1 is the same in both a and b, there is at present
    mathematics.
    2/.2/4 \fbox{-} [1]3/.3/2=1/.5/1
    Mathematics - a new basis-5y.png
    Mathematics - a new basis-5yy.png
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  8. #38
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    k9-gap addition - 0 u a or u b there does not exist in the current mathematics
    2/.4/2 \fbox{+} [1]3/.3/2=0/.5/0
    Mathematics - a new basis-9p.png
    Mathematics - a new basis-9pp.png
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  9. #39
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,693
    Thanks
    1466

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    You are still posting and still have not given any definitions. You cannot expect to make up your own language and then expect people to understand you when you speak it.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  10. #40
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Quote Originally Posted by HallsofIvy View Post
    You are still posting and still have not given any definitions. You cannot expect to make up your own language and then expect people to understand you when you speak it.
    There is no definition,
    ----------------

    k10-gap subtraction - 0 there exists u a (b-no) or u b (a-no), does not exist in the current mathematics
    2/.4/2 \fbox{ -.} [1]3/.3/2=0/.2/2/.1/0
    Mathematics - a new basis-9oo.png
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  11. #41
    MHF Contributor

    Joined
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    15,693
    Thanks
    1466

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Then you are just writing symbols at random?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  12. #42
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    k11-gap opposite subtraction - 0 exists in a and b does not exist in the current mathematics
    2/.4/2 \fbox{-/ }[1]3/.3/2=0/.2/0
    Mathematics - a new basis-8o.png
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  13. #43
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  14. #44
    Forum Admin topsquark's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    From
    Wellsville, NY
    Posts
    9,933
    Thanks
    336
    Awards
    1

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Thank you for posting that part of the paper. It makes things much easier to understand.

    Unfortunately I don't really see the point. I mean there's nothing wrong with looking at things with a fresh start, but your constant comparisons with "typical" Mathematics just doesn't seem to have direction. I looked at the first 10 pages or so (before I got lost in the notation) and came up with two comments:
    1. As an example of your comparisons with current Mathematics: "numerical semi-lines" and "numerical points" are merely a collection of points and line segments. Those concepts are geometric in nature and have been around since Euclid.

    2. At the very least your first 5 or 6 "proofs" end up being derived by introduction of new notation, which in and of itself proves nothing.

    My advice:
    1. Include an abstract to your paper explaining what your goals and results are.

    2. Define your symbols as a part of the proof and use it to actually prove your assertions. New notation does not imply proof. This needs to be sharpened up.

    3. Look more carefully at what's already out there. It's nice to say that the natural numbers are constructed by axiom, but that is not a requirement. The Peano axioms can be used to construct the natural numbers, for example.

    Address at least these issues (maybe someone else will chime in with other thoughts for you) and perhaps post your revised paper. As a Forum we are not going to edit your paper for you but if someone here is willing to give you advice they are welcome to.

    -Dan
    Last edited by topsquark; April 8th 2013 at 01:02 PM.
    Thanks from MarkFL
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  15. #45
    Junior Member
    Joined
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    48

    Re: Mathematics - a new basis

    Here I am again,
    I'll give you an example that challenges sets of numbers (rational, irrational, real)
    question is whether a real number can be written as a fraction (rational number)

    \frac{a}{1} , a \in{R}


    See you again!!
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Mathematics - a new basis
    Posted in the Math Forum
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: February 4th 2013, 05:58 AM
  2. Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 16th 2012, 11:24 PM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: August 30th 2011, 04:48 PM
  4. Mathematics: Discrete-Mathematics (Algorithems)
    Posted in the Discrete Math Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: November 2nd 2008, 06:27 AM
  5. Mathematics Of Degree (the New Mathematics !!!! )
    Posted in the Advanced Math Topics Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: August 26th 2006, 07:35 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum