# Thread: Mathematics - a new basis

1. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

I'm not certain, but as I peruse the thread I am "smelling" from a topic in my Intro to Topology text...There may be something to all this, but I'm betting it can be reworked in terms of Topology. Unfortunately I can't think of which part of Topology I'm thinking of. Certainly there is something to be said about the symmetries and geometries underlined in your work.

Let me make this question. One of the most useful rules for making a readable research paper is the Abstract. You haven't posted one here. So here we are: What is the overall point of your paper? I can't even begin to figure out which branch of Mathematics that this might be under.

-Dan

2. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

Originally Posted by topsquark
What is the overall point of your paper?

-Dan
review of current mathematics, a perfect representations of mathematics that has the answers to all the challenges ...
..................
Theorem - Gap is added between two gap number.

EVIDENCE - 1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$[0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0

1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [1]0/.1/1/.170=0/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [.2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.2/0

1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [.1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0

1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1$\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [.0]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0

The general form a $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [q]=c or a $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [.q]=c.
The general form in opposite numbers

3. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

2.15 subtract gap "2.14"
Theorem - The addition of a gap relationship where the gaps are merging, this relationship is deleted, leaving the rest.
EVIDENCE - 1/.2/1$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0

1/.2/1$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/2/.1/0 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [.2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/2/.1/0

1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [.1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0

1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [.0]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0

The general form a$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [q]=c ili a $\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [.q]=c.
The general form of the opposite numbers.

--------
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
subtract gap - no

4. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

2.16 gap contrary subtract"2.14"
Theorem - The addition of a relationship gaps where gaps together, he remains, the rest is deleted.

Evidence - - 1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$[3]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0 or
1/.2/1$\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [.0]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0

1/.2/1$\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [2]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0 or
1/.2/1$\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [.1]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0

1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [1]0/.1/1/./0=0 or
1/.2/1$\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [.2]0/.1/1/./0=0
w
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/./0=0 or
1/.2/1$\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [.3]0/.1/1/./0=0

The general form a $\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$[q] b=c , a $\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [.q] b=c .
The general form of the opposite numbers.

5. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

Evidence - 1/.2/1+ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=2/.1/1 or
1/.2/1+[.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=2/.1/1
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{+}$ [.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0 follows

The general form

The general form of the opposite numbers.

---------------------
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
gap contrary subtract - no

6. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

Originally Posted by msbiljanica
review of current mathematics, a perfect representations of mathematics that has the answers to all the challenges ...
"...all challenges."

What challenges?

-Dan

7. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

2.18 Multi subtraction "2.12,2.15"
Theorem -subtraction and subtract gap two gaps number.
EVIDENCE -2/.3/2- [1]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1 or
2/.3/2-[.6]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1
2/.3/2$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$[1]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 or
2/.3/2$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [.6]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 follows

The general form

The general form of the opposite numbers.

8. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

Originally Posted by msbiljanica
2.18 Multi subtraction "2.12,2.15"
Theorem -subtraction and subtract gap two gaps number.
EVIDENCE -2/.3/2- [1]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1 or
2/.3/2-[.6]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1
2/.3/2$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$[1]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 or
2/.3/2$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$ [.6]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 follows

The general form

The general form of the opposite numbers.

(sighs) Will you please just post your paper instead of snippets? It would make it much easier to post intelligent questions.

Again: What challenges are there in the "usual" Mathematics that are "fixed" by your approach?

-Dan

9. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

Originally Posted by topsquark
What challenges are there in the "usual" Mathematics that are "fixed" by your approach?

-Dan
- That there are arithmetic operations which no current mathematics
-that there are different forms of the function
-that there is a graph of the function with three (more) variable
...
you seem to have a lot of eager, ...
TEST -to see if you learned anything
2.8
a)4/.45/3/.32/3=?
b)56/.3/21/.3/1=?
2.10
a)4/.5/3s.+[3]4/.12/3s.=?
b)3/.8/3s.+[7]4/.4/8s.=?
2.12
a)4/.6/3s.-[.5]6/.10/3s.=?
b)5/.5/5/.5/5s.-[.8]3/.2/3/.3/2s.=?
2.13
a)2/.3/2/.3/2s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-}$[.6]6/.3/6/.3/2s.=?
b)3/.5/3/.5/3s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-}$[7]4/.5/3/.1/1s.=?
2.14
a)4/.3/2/.1/0s.$\displaystyle \fbox{+}$[.4]5/.6/4/.7/3s.=?
b)7/.6/7s.$\displaystyle \fbox{+}$[5]4/.4/4s.=?
2.15
a)4/.5/4/.5/4s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$[7]3/.3/3/.3/3s.=?
b)6/.5/4/.3/2s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-.}$[.6]5/.2/5/.2/5s.=?
2.16
a)3/.4/5s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$[.3]6/.3/6/.3/6s.=?
b)4/.4/3/.3/2s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$[9]2/.3/4/.5/6s.=?
2.17
a)3/.4/3/.4/3s.$\displaystyle \fbox{+m}$[7]6/.5/4/.6/1s.=?
b)5/.5/5/.5/2s.$\displaystyle \fbox{+m}$[.10]3/.4/5/.4/2s.=?
2.18
a)4/.5/6s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-m}$[6]7/.5/3/.1/1s.=?
b)2/.2/7/.1/2s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-m}$[.5]5/.4/5/.4/5s.=?
2.19
a)4/.4/4/.4/5s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-.m}$[9]3/.3/3/.3/2s.=?
b)4/.5/4/.5/4s.$\displaystyle \fbox{-.m}$[.9]4/.3/2/.1/0s.=?
-----------------
2.19 Multi contrary subtract "2.13,2.16"
Theorem - contrary subtract and gap contrary subtract two gaps numbers

EVIDENCE-1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=2/.1/1 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-}$ [.4]0/.1/1/.1/0=2/.1/1
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{-/}$[.4]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0 follows

The general form

The general form of the opposite numbers.

10. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

2.20 Multiply "2.10"
Theorem - Two (more) gathering and collecting the same gap
number (N, GN) can be abbreviated to write.
EVIDENCE-2+2 follows 2x2 , 1/.2/1+1/.2/1 follows 1/.2/1x2
2+2+2 follows 2x3 , 1/.2/1+1/.2/1+1/.2/1 follows 1/.2/1x3
2+2+2+2 follows 2x4 ,1/.2/1+1/.2/1+1/.2/1+1/.2/1 follows 1/.2/1x4
...
The general form - a+a follows ax2
a+a+a follows ax3
a+a+a+a follows ax4
...
2x[0]3=2

2x[1]3=4

2x[2]3=6

EVIDENCE -1/.1/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{x}$ [0] 3=0/.1/0
1/.1/1$\displaystyle \fbox{x}$  [1] 3=0/.3/0
1/.1/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{x}$  [2] 3=0/.1/1/.1/1/.1/0
1/.1/1 $\displaystyle \fbox{x}$  [3] 3=0/.1/2/.1/2/.1/0
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
Multi subtraction - no
Multi contrary subtract -no
Multiply - axiom (only natural numbers)

11. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

2.21 Dealing "2:22"
Theorm - from the number (N) is subtracted one (more) of
b (N) to the numerical point 0, and the number (numbers arising from previous subtraction), and have compared the number of b - their point [.0] are
connected.
EVIDENCE-6-2=4 , 4-2=2 , 2-2=0 follows 6:2=3.

general form: a-b=0 follows a:b=1
a-b=b , b-b=0 follows a:b=2
a-b=c , c-b=b , b-b=0 follows a:b=3
...

12. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

You are giving a lot of what, I guess, are examples of what you mean but you still haven't given a single definition. Without that, we cannot understand what you are trying to say.

13. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

Originally Posted by HallsofIvy
You are giving a lot of what, I guess, are examples of what you mean but you still haven't given a single definition. Without that, we cannot understand what you are trying to say.
definition - 1 Mathematics Space
-------------
I use a notebook in the box, there is a grid, and this work (kn (k-step, n-number of steps))
k1 - ask a numeric semi line

k2-natural numbers conversion in geometric form and sequence of units (not represent a binary number)

k3-converting gap in the number of geometric form and sequence of ones and zeros (not pose a binary number). general form of emptiness:
a / .b / c
a / .b / d / .e / c
a / .b / d / .e / f / .g / c
...
(a and c) the external number of vacancies they may be {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7, ...}, the other numbers are the inner emptiness of those can be {1,2,3, 4,5,6,7, ...}

14. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

First: You (or your translator) need to learn English better.

Second: This is more or less Euclid's treatment of ratios. Your notation is different from any I've seen but why do you think that $\displaystyle 110011$ is any better than $\displaystyle x \in $0, 2$ \cup $4, 6$$ ? I don't see any practical difference between the two.

I can follow (to a degree) what you are doing and what your notation is but what practical use is this? I see nothing here that I haven't seen before in Topology. It's Geometry just with a different notation.

-Dan

15. ## Re: Mathematics - a new basis

Originally Posted by topsquark
First: You (or your translator) need to learn English better.

Second: This is more or less Euclid's treatment of ratios. Your notation is different from any I've seen but why do you think that $\displaystyle 110011$ is any better than $\displaystyle x \in $0, 2$ \cup $4, 6$$ ? I don't see any practical difference between the two.

I can follow (to a degree) what you are doing and what your notation is but what practical use is this? I see nothing here that I haven't seen before in Topology. It's Geometry just with a different notation.

-Dan
2.in my notation used fewer characters, look down and to show the current notation math, you find that to be a lot of signs of this (2/.2/4 + [1] 3/.3/2 =9 , 18 -character )
---------------

k4 - opposite numbers, geometric basis - instead of 1 set to 0, instead of 0 to 1 sets
example, the number 7 (its opposite is 0/.7/0). 2/.2/2 (its opposite is 0/.2/2/.2/0)

k5 - the calculation, the general form aw [q] b = c, first number-a, second number-b,c- one or more
solution calculation, w-calculation, [g]-a place where it happens the calculation
(refers to (a) number)
Addition - 1 exist in the a or b (2/.2/4 + [1] 3/.3/2 =9)
, 2 +2 = 4 (addition to current mathematics)

Page 2 of 4 First 1234 Last