Mathematics - a new basis

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 4 First 1234 Last
• Feb 19th 2013, 02:32 PM
topsquark
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
I'm not certain, but as I peruse the thread I am "smelling" from a topic in my Intro to Topology text...There may be something to all this, but I'm betting it can be reworked in terms of Topology. Unfortunately I can't think of which part of Topology I'm thinking of. Certainly there is something to be said about the symmetries and geometries underlined in your work.

Let me make this question. One of the most useful rules for making a readable research paper is the Abstract. You haven't posted one here. So here we are: What is the overall point of your paper? I can't even begin to figure out which branch of Mathematics that this might be under.

-Dan
• Feb 20th 2013, 06:37 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Quote:

Originally Posted by topsquark
What is the overall point of your paper?

-Dan

review of current mathematics, a perfect representations of mathematics that has the answers to all the challenges ...
..................
Theorem - Gap is added between two gap number.

EVIDENCE - 1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$[0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0
Attachment 27155
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [1]0/.1/1/.170=0/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [.2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.2/0
Attachment 27156
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [.1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0
Attachment 27157
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [.0]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0
Attachment 27158
The general form a $\fbox{+}$ [q]=c or a $\fbox{+}$ [.q]=c.
The general form in opposite numbers
Attachment 27159
• Feb 21st 2013, 05:31 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.15 subtract gap "2.14"
Theorem - The addition of a gap relationship where the gaps are merging, this relationship is deleted, leaving the rest.
EVIDENCE - 1/.2/1 $\fbox{-.}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-.}$ [.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0
Attachment 27172
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-.}$ [1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/2/.1/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-.}$ [.2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/2/.1/0
Attachment 27173
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-.}$ [2]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-.}$ [.1]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.3/0
Attachment 27174
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-.}$ [3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-.}$ [.0]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.1/1/.1/1/.2/0
Attachment 27175
The general form a $\fbox{-.}$ [q]=c ili a $\fbox{-.}$ [.q]=c.
The general form of the opposite numbers.
Attachment 27176
--------
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
subtract gap - no
• Feb 22nd 2013, 06:03 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.16 gap contrary subtract"2.14"
Theorem - The addition of a relationship gaps where gaps together, he remains, the rest is deleted.

Evidence - - 1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$[3]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$ [.0]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0
Attachment 27185
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$ [2]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$ [.1]0/.1/1/./0=0/.1/0
Attachment 27186
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$ [1]0/.1/1/./0=0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$ [.2]0/.1/1/./0=0
wAttachment 27187
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/./0=0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$ [.3]0/.1/1/./0=0
Attachment 27188
The general form a $\fbox{-/}$[q] b=c , a $\fbox{-/}$ [.q] b=c .
The general form of the opposite numbers.
Attachment 27189
• Feb 23rd 2013, 04:42 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis

Evidence - 1/.2/1+ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=2/.1/1 or
1/.2/1+[.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=2/.1/1
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{+}$ [.3]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.3/0 follows
Attachment 27197
The general form
Attachment 27198
The general form of the opposite numbers.
Attachment 27199
Attachment 27200
---------------------
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
gap contrary subtract - no
• Feb 23rd 2013, 06:34 AM
topsquark
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Quote:

Originally Posted by msbiljanica
review of current mathematics, a perfect representations of mathematics that has the answers to all the challenges ...

"...all challenges."

What challenges?

-Dan
• Feb 24th 2013, 02:54 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.18 Multi subtraction "2.12,2.15"
Theorem -subtraction and subtract gap two gaps number.
EVIDENCE -2/.3/2- [1]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1 or
2/.3/2-[.6]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1
2/.3/2 $\fbox{-.}$[1]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 or
2/.3/2 $\fbox{-.}$ [.6]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 follows
Attachment 27219
The general form
Attachment 27220
The general form of the opposite numbers.
Attachment 27221
Attachment 27222
• Feb 25th 2013, 07:43 AM
topsquark
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Quote:

Originally Posted by msbiljanica
2.18 Multi subtraction "2.12,2.15"
Theorem -subtraction and subtract gap two gaps number.
EVIDENCE -2/.3/2- [1]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1 or
2/.3/2-[.6]2/.2/1=1/.1/1/.3/1
2/.3/2 $\fbox{-.}$[1]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 or
2/.3/2 $\fbox{-.}$ [.6]2/.2/1=0/.1/0 follows
Attachment 27219
The general form
Attachment 27220
The general form of the opposite numbers.
Attachment 27221
Attachment 27222

(sighs) Will you please just post your paper instead of snippets? It would make it much easier to post intelligent questions.

Again: What challenges are there in the "usual" Mathematics that are "fixed" by your approach?

-Dan
• Feb 25th 2013, 08:32 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Quote:

Originally Posted by topsquark
What challenges are there in the "usual" Mathematics that are "fixed" by your approach?

-Dan

- That there are arithmetic operations which no current mathematics
-that there are different forms of the function
-that there is a graph of the function with three (more) variable
...
you seem to have a lot of eager, ...
TEST -to see if you learned anything
2.8
a)4/.45/3/.32/3=?
b)56/.3/21/.3/1=?
2.10
a)4/.5/3s.+[3]4/.12/3s.=?
b)3/.8/3s.+[7]4/.4/8s.=?
2.12
a)4/.6/3s.-[.5]6/.10/3s.=?
b)5/.5/5/.5/5s.-[.8]3/.2/3/.3/2s.=?
2.13
a)2/.3/2/.3/2s. $\fbox{-}$[.6]6/.3/6/.3/2s.=?
b)3/.5/3/.5/3s. $\fbox{-}$[7]4/.5/3/.1/1s.=?
2.14
a)4/.3/2/.1/0s. $\fbox{+}$[.4]5/.6/4/.7/3s.=?
b)7/.6/7s. $\fbox{+}$[5]4/.4/4s.=?
2.15
a)4/.5/4/.5/4s. $\fbox{-.}$[7]3/.3/3/.3/3s.=?
b)6/.5/4/.3/2s. $\fbox{-.}$[.6]5/.2/5/.2/5s.=?
2.16
a)3/.4/5s. $\fbox{-/}$[.3]6/.3/6/.3/6s.=?
b)4/.4/3/.3/2s. $\fbox{-/}$[9]2/.3/4/.5/6s.=?
2.17
a)3/.4/3/.4/3s. $\fbox{+m}$[7]6/.5/4/.6/1s.=?
b)5/.5/5/.5/2s. $\fbox{+m}$[.10]3/.4/5/.4/2s.=?
2.18
a)4/.5/6s. $\fbox{-m}$[6]7/.5/3/.1/1s.=?
b)2/.2/7/.1/2s. $\fbox{-m}$[.5]5/.4/5/.4/5s.=?
2.19
a)4/.4/4/.4/5s. $\fbox{-.m}$[9]3/.3/3/.3/2s.=?
b)4/.5/4/.5/4s. $\fbox{-.m}$[.9]4/.3/2/.1/0s.=?
-----------------
2.19 Multi contrary subtract "2.13,2.16"
Theorem - contrary subtract and gap contrary subtract two gaps numbers

EVIDENCE-1/.2/1 $\fbox{-}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=2/.1/1 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-}$ [.4]0/.1/1/.1/0=2/.1/1
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$ [0 ]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0 or
1/.2/1 $\fbox{-/}$[.4]0/.1/1/.1/0=0/.2/0 follows
Attachment 27246
The general form
Attachment 27247
The general form of the opposite numbers.
Attachment 27248
Attachment 27249
• Feb 26th 2013, 04:31 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.20 Multiply "2.10"
Theorem - Two (more) gathering and collecting the same gap
number (N, GN) can be abbreviated to write.
EVIDENCE-2+2 follows 2x2 , 1/.2/1+1/.2/1 follows 1/.2/1x2
2+2+2 follows 2x3 , 1/.2/1+1/.2/1+1/.2/1 follows 1/.2/1x3
2+2+2+2 follows 2x4 ,1/.2/1+1/.2/1+1/.2/1+1/.2/1 follows 1/.2/1x4
...
The general form - a+a follows ax2
a+a+a follows ax3
a+a+a+a follows ax4
...
2x[0]3=2
Attachment 27260
2x[1]3=4
Attachment 27261
2x[2]3=6
Attachment 27262
EVIDENCE -1/.1/1 $\fbox{x}$ [0] 3=0/.1/0
1/.1/1 $\fbox{x}$  [1] 3=0/.3/0
1/.1/1 $\fbox{x}$  [2] 3=0/.1/1/.1/1/.1/0
1/.1/1 $\fbox{x}$  [3] 3=0/.1/2/.1/2/.1/0
Comparability of the two mathematics ( down what is given of the current mathematics)
Multi subtraction - no
Multi contrary subtract -no
Multiply - axiom (only natural numbers)
• Feb 27th 2013, 07:31 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.21 Dealing "2:22"
Theorm - from the number (N) is subtracted one (more) of
b (N) to the numerical point 0, and the number (numbers arising from previous subtraction), and have compared the number of b - their point [.0] are
connected.
EVIDENCE-6-2=4 , 4-2=2 , 2-2=0 follows 6:2=3.
Attachment 27277
general form: a-b=0 follows a:b=1
a-b=b , b-b=0 follows a:b=2
a-b=c , c-b=b , b-b=0 follows a:b=3
...
• Feb 27th 2013, 08:01 AM
HallsofIvy
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
You are giving a lot of what, I guess, are examples of what you mean but you still haven't given a single definition. Without that, we cannot understand what you are trying to say.
• Mar 3rd 2013, 07:47 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Quote:

Originally Posted by HallsofIvy
You are giving a lot of what, I guess, are examples of what you mean but you still haven't given a single definition. Without that, we cannot understand what you are trying to say.

definition - 1 Mathematics Space
-------------
I use a notebook in the box, there is a grid, and this work (kn (k-step, n-number of steps))
k1 - ask a numeric semi line
Attachment 27341
k2-natural numbers conversion in geometric form and sequence of units (not represent a binary number)
Attachment 27342
k3-converting gap in the number of geometric form and sequence of ones and zeros (not pose a binary number). general form of emptiness:
a / .b / c
a / .b / d / .e / c
a / .b / d / .e / f / .g / c
...
(a and c) the external number of vacancies they may be {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7, ...}, the other numbers are the inner emptiness of those can be {1,2,3, 4,5,6,7, ...}
Attachment 27343
• Mar 3rd 2013, 10:45 AM
topsquark
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
First: You (or your translator) need to learn English better.

Second: This is more or less Euclid's treatment of ratios. Your notation is different from any I've seen but why do you think that $110011$ is any better than $x \in $0, 2$ \cup $4, 6$$ ? I don't see any practical difference between the two.

I can follow (to a degree) what you are doing and what your notation is but what practical use is this? I see nothing here that I haven't seen before in Topology. It's Geometry just with a different notation.

-Dan
• Mar 5th 2013, 07:45 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Quote:

Originally Posted by topsquark
First: You (or your translator) need to learn English better.

Second: This is more or less Euclid's treatment of ratios. Your notation is different from any I've seen but why do you think that $110011$ is any better than $x \in $0, 2$ \cup $4, 6$$ ? I don't see any practical difference between the two.

I can follow (to a degree) what you are doing and what your notation is but what practical use is this? I see nothing here that I haven't seen before in Topology. It's Geometry just with a different notation.

-Dan

2.in my notation used fewer characters, look down and to show the current notation math, you find that to be a lot of signs of this (2/.2/4 + [1] 3/.3/2 =9 , 18 -character )
---------------

k4 - opposite numbers, geometric basis - instead of 1 set to 0, instead of 0 to 1 sets
example, the number 7 (its opposite is 0/.7/0). 2/.2/2 (its opposite is 0/.2/2/.2/0)
Attachment 27365

k5 - the calculation, the general form aw [q] b = c, first number-a, second number-b,c- one or more
solution calculation, w-calculation, [g]-a place where it happens the calculation
(refers to (a) number)
Addition - 1 exist in the a or b (2/.2/4 + [1] 3/.3/2 =9)
, 2 +2 = 4 (addition to current mathematics)
Attachment 27366
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 4 First 1234 Last