Letbe positive, pairwise relatively prime integers, i.e.
Without loss of generality, show that, where
. Note: I have already shown that
, so
is well-defined. See http://www.mathhelpforum.com/math-he...e-theorem.html
Or give a counterexample. *I know this looks random and complicated, but this result has implications for Carmichael Numbers.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks