Which one of the following numbers cannot be expressed as the difference of the squares of two integers?

A:314159265

B:314159266

C:314159267

D:314159268

E:314159269

For this one, I'm just completley clueless.

Printable View

- Oct 18th 2006, 01:36 PMceasar_19134Difference of the squares of two integers
Which one of the following numbers cannot be expressed as the difference of the squares of two integers?

A:314159265

B:314159266

C:314159267

D:314159268

E:314159269

For this one, I'm just completley clueless. - Oct 18th 2006, 01:57 PMThePerfectHacker
Numbers of the form 4k,4k+1,4k+3 can always be expressed as a difference of squares.

Remove the odd numbers for they can always be expressed as difference of squares are you have,

314159266

314159268

Divide them by 4 and find the one which leaves a remainder of 2.

Since both are even they leave either no remiander or 2.

Thus, find the number not divisible by 4.

The trick is to look at the last two digits,

66----> Not Divisible

68----> Yes Divisible

Thus, the answer is,

314159266 - Oct 18th 2006, 02:02 PMCaptainBlack
The prime factorisation of 314159266 is:

314159266=2x157079633

Now if N=314159266 is the difference of two square integers there exists

integers m > n such that:

N = m^2-n^2 = (m+n)(m-n).

Now if (m-n) is even then both n and m are even or both are odd. But as

we can see from the factorisation (m-n)=2, and (m+n)= 157079633,

that is one of (m+n) and (m-n) is odd and the other even which is not

possible so N is not expressible as the difference of two squares.

RonL - Oct 27th 2006, 10:21 AMceasar_19134
- Oct 27th 2006, 10:46 AMCaptainBlack
- Oct 27th 2006, 10:57 AMceasar_19134
So we subsitute the numbers in as k and then what?

And why does the remainder have any significance?

My teacher does not bother teaching us how to solve any of these problems. - Oct 27th 2006, 11:21 AMSoroban
Hello, ceasar_19134!

Quote:

Which one of the following numbers cannot be expressed

as the difference of the squares of two integers?

A: 314159265

B: 314159266

C: 314159267

D: 314159268

E: 314159269

It can be shown that*any*odd number can be expressed as the difference of two squares.******

The only suspects are B and D.

To have an even difference of squares,

. . either (1) both squares are even or (2) both squares are odd.

(1) If both and are even, then both and are even.

. . Then and for some integers and

Hence: .

. . Therefore: is a multiple of 4.

(2) If both and are odd, then both and are odd.

. . Then and for some integers and

Hence: .

. . Therefore: is a multiple of 4.

We have just established a theorem.

. .*The difference of two squares is either odd or a multiple of 4.*

We can now "eyeball" the list and determine the answer.

The even choice not divisible by 4 is:

. . [Its last two digits is "66", which is not divisible by 4.]

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

******

Two*consecutive*squares always differ by an odd number

. . because: . ... an odd number

Given an odd difference, we can find the two squares.

Example:

Subtract 1 and divide by 2: .

The two squares are: and

Given answer-choice

. . we can confidently state that: .