Euclid's Proof of Infinite Number of Primes: Suppose thatare all of the primes. Let
and let
be a prime dividing
; then
can not be any of
,
, ...,
, otherwise
would divide the difference
, which is impossible. So this prime
is still another prime, and
would not be all of the primes.
(a) Why can'tdivide
, where
is one of
?
Proof: We want to show thatis false. To prove this, choose
with
. Then
divides
if there is an element
such that
. Suppose for contradiction that
divides
. Then
where
. Since
by definition,
. Contradiction. Thus
cannot divide
.
Is this correct?


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

