How would one go about in order to prove
I would try doing something like this
however I'm not sure how to actually interpret. It's periodic function which returns remainders and repeatedly so, what would it's algebraic expression perhaps be?
How would one go about in order to prove
I would try doing something like this
however I'm not sure how to actually interpret. It's periodic function which returns remainders and repeatedly so, what would it's algebraic expression perhaps be?
Your notation is strange. Either you have a relationor you have a function x mod n, which returns the remainder when x is divided by n. In the first case, you can't use mod in both sides of the relation. In the second case, you can't use
, or, at least, you need to define it.
if one uses [a] for the remainder of a, upon division by the integer n (where this remainder is between 0 and n-1, inclusive), we can state this as:
[ab] = [[a]b]. note that [a] is just an integer.
this can be shown using induction on b:
for b = 1:
[a] = [[a]], since 0 ≤ [a] ≤ n-1.
assume that for b = k,
[ak] = [[a]k].
then:
[ak+1] = [(a)(ak)] = [[a][ak]] (see below)
= [[a][[a]k]] (by our inductive hypothesis)
= [[[a]][[a]k]] (by our base case, [a] = [[a]])
= [[a][a]k] (again, see below)
= [[a]k+1]
(the crucial step is this:
[[x][y]] = [xy].
note that if x = tn + c, y = un + d, where 0 ≤ c,d < n that:
xy = (tn + c)(un + d) = (tun + c + d)n + cd. writing cd = wn + f, for 0 ≤ f < n, xy = (tun + c + d + w)n + f,
so we have:
[[x][y]] = [cd] = f = [xy]. one can view this as "a rule for brackets and multiplying": remove the outer 2 brackets on each side, and the innermost pair, multiply and add outer brackets).