Dear all,
I'm looking at this particular proof that is irrational. Please find it beneath my writing.
This proof by contradiction assumes that . I understand this.
However, while proving that is the contradiction, the proof uses the second boxed inequality
where
and
and so on...
However, although , it is entirely possible for AND since .
In this case then the , so the above steps and the proof itself fail?
Thank you very much for your assistance.
Proof: