http://sites.google.com/site/asdfasdf23135/nt6.JPG
[also under discussion in math links forum]
Printable View
http://sites.google.com/site/asdfasdf23135/nt6.JPG
[also under discussion in math links forum]
Letbe even.
Thensince
is a primitive root.
Ifis odd, then
, but
for this would mean
which we know to be false since
.
Thereforeis a primitive root if
.
Ifthen
, so
i.e.
is odd. Therefore
.
Now since. Let
.
We know. But since
is a primitive root,
.
Therefore. Hence
is not a primitive root for
.
Hi, thanks for your help! I have some questions about your proof.
1) When you say k|p-1 is odd or k|p-1 is even, do you include the case k=p-1? Or are you only referring to the divisors of p-1 that are strictly less than p-1?
2) Also, how do you know that 2k is strictly less than p-1? (i.e. 2k < p-1?)
Thank you very much!
1.) Yes, I meant to say k is strictly less than p-1
2.) What's the smallest divisor of p-1 not equal to 1? The answer is 2.
Thereforeis the largest divisor strictly less than p-1.
But we knowand
is odd.
So, sinceand
is the largest proper divisor we have
i.e..