What I wanted Flower3 to think about was that there "might" have been primes of that form, and I wanted him (or most likely her) to investigate how this could have been a prime. The observation should be that if two of the factors are equal to 1, then the number is prime. And the conclusion would be that no two factors can be simultaneously equal to one, hence there is no prime of that form ...
I thought that was pedagogic.
This thread takes me on a stroll down memory lane.