It's part of a larger problem but this is what I got left;
if 3^a - 2^a is a prime number, then a is a prime number.
If anyone could point me to the right direction to prove/disprove this, it would be nice. Thanks!
I do not know if i am going to help you, but:
Why dont you try to expand the identity as follow:
From binomial expansion we have:
And then we have the equality:
From there i have nothing more...
Some ideas:
If we rise both sides to a expand the right side and the again rise to a,
mayby we could compare the addition terms.
or
if we try to simplify left side by divisions of 2.
again i do not know if this helps to prove (or disprove) your identity.
The contrapositive is easier to prove.
So you need to show that:
Ifis NOT a prime number, then
is NOT a prime number.
Recall that a prime number is one that only has 1 and itself as factors.
So to show thatis not prime, we would have to show that it has a common factor.
First, ifis not prime, then it can be expressed as
, where
.
So
Therefore
.
Now we make use of the factorisation rule
.
So
.
Thusis not prime.
So, ifis not prime, then
is not prime.
Therefore, ifIS prime, then
is prime.
I got to that and the factors when I tried the problem a few hours later but I wasn't sure if I was right. Can you just say that? I mean,
(or doesnt it count because it CAN be written
and then **** it up?) would'nt be a prime and it wouldn't screw up the
factor later on. I dont need to show that the factor with the sum is
prime if for example
and
or any other number
where
and
prime?
Sorry for the stupid questions, I'm kinda new to this proving thing. Really appreciate the help!