# Mathematics - a new basis

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 2 First 12
• January 30th 2013, 11:19 PM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Quote:

Originally Posted by topsquark
I've looked at the paper a bit and even though I cannot understand much of what you are doing it appears that it makes some sort of sense. However you are not making sense in this thread as you have repeatedly ignored my requests for answers and merely posted snippets of information. You still haven't defined, for example, what a dynamic number is.

Since you are talking about a paper you have written this should properly belong to the Peer Math Review forum. Please post your thread there if you wish to continue the discussion.

-Dan

I will respond with pictures-dynamic number, R-positive real numbers , (d,d1,d2)-continuation of numbers (as a variable, so called dynamic numbers)
2Rd(3)
Attachment 26772
5.33Rd1 (6) d2 (7) +3 = 7 , 33Rd1 (6) d2 (7) +3 = 6 ,33Rd1 (6) d2 (7) +3 = 0
3Rd1 (6) d2 (7)
Attachment 26773
--------------
2.4 Mobile Number "2.2,2.3"
Theorem-Natural numbers can be specified and other numerical
point other than the point numeric 0th
Proof - Value (length) numeric point (0) and numeric point (2)
the number 2
Attachment 26776
Ratio (length) numeric point (1) and the numerical point of (3) is the number 2
Attachment 26777
Ratio (length) numerical point (2) and the numerical point of (4) is the number 2
Attachment 26778
...
A set of mobile numbers Nn = {[n]N}
• February 1st 2013, 12:26 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.5 Gap numbers "2.2,2.3,2.4"
Theorem - Natural number and mobile number of no contact,
(natural number and mobile number no contact) and have no contact mobile number, ..., in numeric longer.

EVIDENCE - natural number 2 and mobile number 2 no contact, you get the number of gaps 2/.1/2.
Attachment 26792
natural number 2 and mobile number 2 no contact, you get the number of gaps 2/.2/2.
Attachment 26793
natural number 2 and mobile number 2 no contact, you get the number of gaps 2/.3/2.
Attachment 26794
...
(natural number 2 and mobile number 2 no contact) and mobile number 1 no contact , you get the number of gaps
2/.1/2/.1/1
Attachment 26795
...
Set gap number GN={a|/.bn/cn|(a,bn,cn) $\in$ $N$,bn>0}
a/.b1/c1
a/.b1/c1/.b2/c2
a/.b1/c1/.b2/c2/.b3/c3
a/.b1/c1/.b2/c2/.b3/c3/.b4/c4
...
• February 1st 2013, 05:34 AM
topsquark
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
1. Please put this into the Peer Math forum.

2. If you want to post something then make it as a response to a question. This is a "Help" forum where we help people with their questions about Mathematics. This site is not a vehicle designed to get your ideas out in the open. Or whatever your goal is.

-Dan
• February 1st 2013, 10:00 AM
zzephod
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Quote:

Originally Posted by topsquark
I've looked at the paper a bit and even though I cannot understand much of what you are doing it appears that it makes some sort of sense.

It fails at the first hurdle:

Quote:

$1.\ {\text{A set of numbers is given}}$ $A=\{2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, ...\},$
${\text{Exp}} | {\text{the smallest number }} (a) {\text{ of the set }} A,\ a=2,\ 2,\ B|}$
Is just gobbledygook, to me at least.

I think the OP should try posting this to a maths site that uses his native language, and let them try to disentangle what he means (assuming it makes any sense at all, and I would not bet on that)

.
• February 2nd 2013, 01:04 AM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.6. Mobile gap number "2.2,2.5"
Theorem-Gap numbers can be entered and the second numerical
point other than the point numeric 0th

EVIDENCE-ratio (length) numeric point (0) and the numerical point of (4) is
2/.1/1 number of gap.

Attachment 26813

ratio (length) numeric point (1) and the numerical point of (5) is
2/.1/1 number of gap.

Attachment 26814

ratio (length) numeric point (2) and the numerical point of (6) is
2/.1/1 number of gap.
Attachment 26815
...
A set of mobile numbers gap GNn={[n]GN}
• February 2nd 2013, 10:52 PM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.7. Points the number of "2.2,2.3,2.5"
Theorem - Number (N,GN) has extended the numeric point, they
can write the opposite.

EVIDENCE - Number 5 has a point: [0], [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. Opposite may
write: [.0], [.1], [.2], [.3], [.4], [.5].

Attachment 26826

Gaps has a number 2/.3/1 points: [0], [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. They can be
otherwise write: [.0], [.1], [.2], [.3], [.4], [.5), [.6].

Attachment 26827
• February 3rd 2013, 11:39 PM
msbiljanica
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
2.8. The opposite number "2.2,2.3,2.5,2.7"
Theorem - Numbers (N, GN) that have the same number of points
number, length becomes gap and rotation.
EVIDENCE - 4 $\fbox{s}$ 0/.4/0 , 4s. = {4, 0/.4/0 } or 0/.4/0s.= {0/.4/0,4}.

Attachment 26845

1/.1/3 $\fbox{s}$ 0/.1/1/.3/0 , 1/.1/3s. = {1/.1/3, 0/.1/1/.3/0} or
0/.1/1/.3/0s. ={ 0/.1/1/.3/0, 1/.1/3}

Attachment 26846

The general form of a $\fbox{s}$ b. as.= {a, b} or bs. = {b, a}.

A set of numbers opposing S. = {(a, b) $\in$(N, GN)}, S.n = {(a, b) $\in$ (Nn, GNn)}
• February 4th 2013, 05:58 AM
topsquark
Re: Mathematics - a new basis
Though I have become loathe about this thread I will give you one, count them, one last chance. No. I've warned you before and you haven't followed instructions. I'd like to introduce you to a couple of my family members:
David Banner
Bruce Banner
topsquark Banner

-Dan
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page
Page 2 of 2 First 12