Hey!

Odd * Odd numbers are always odd correct??

Can you check the following numbers?

7^19,

9^17,

9^18,

9^19 ? I have a program that says they are all divisible by 2.

Isnt that peculiar?

andrec

Printable View

- Jan 15th 2013, 02:25 PMandrecparity of numbers
Hey!

Odd * Odd numbers are always odd correct??

Can you check the following numbers?

7^19,

9^17,

9^18,

9^19 ? I have a program that says they are all divisible by 2.

Isnt that peculiar?

andrec - Jan 15th 2013, 02:35 PMjakncokeRe: parity of numbers
What? I don't know if you are trying to troll.

- Jan 15th 2013, 02:38 PMemakarovRe: parity of numbers
Can you post the program and the name of the programming language?

- Jan 15th 2013, 02:42 PMandrecRe: parity of numbers
public class logic {

/**

* @param args

*/

public static void main(String[] args) {

// TODO Auto-generated method stub

double eSquare=0;

int evenPlus1=0;

for (int even = 0; even < 10; even+=2) {

for (int n=0;n < 20; n+=1) {

evenPlus1 =even+1;

eSquare = Math.pow(evenPlus1,n); //(even+1)^n

if ((eSquare % 2) ==0)

System.out.println(evenPlus1+"^"+n+" "+eSquare+" is divisible by 2");

}

}

}

}

its java. :)

later,

andrec - Jan 15th 2013, 02:44 PMDevenoRe: parity of numbers
since 2 is a prime and:

either 2 divides 7 (clearly false) or 2 divides .

rinse and repeat. - Jan 15th 2013, 02:47 PMandrecRe: parity of numbers
sorry didnt understodd.. :(

9=7^18??!?!?

later,

andrec - Jan 15th 2013, 03:05 PMemakarovRe: parity of numbers
This effect is probably due to overflow. Double numbers are represented as where m is the mantissa and e is the exponent. Positive integers can only be represented precisely if they fit in the mantissa. According to this document, type

*double*allots 53 bits to the mantissa. Interestingly, , so requires 54 bits to be represented precisely. Therefore, as a*double*, it will be represented as for some m, which is an even number. - Jan 15th 2013, 03:08 PMandrecRe: parity of numbers
yep, i just tested it on windows calculator and it works there

thanks.. :)

suprisingly the c code similiar to the java code has the same error

andrec - Jan 15th 2013, 04:15 PMtopsquarkRe: parity of numbers
Never

*ever*trust a calculator over your own mind!

-Dan - Jan 15th 2013, 04:32 PMemakarovRe: parity of numbers
This must be because both C and Java implement the IEEE 754 standard for binary floating point numbers. This tutorial says, "This data type [float] should never be used for precise values, such as currency. For that, you will need to use the java.math.BigDecimal class instead." Also, Java

*long*type has 64 bits, so it can precisely represent positive integers up to 2^63 - 1, which is more than*double*can. - Jan 15th 2013, 04:42 PMPlatoRe: parity of numbers
That is the whole of this opinion piece.

It may be fifteen years old, but it is still true today. - Jan 16th 2013, 07:27 AMandrecRe: parity of numbers
cheers,

thanks to all (bigdecimal works fine)

later,

andrec - Jan 16th 2013, 10:55 AMjohngRe: parity of numbers
Hi Andrec,

If you are going to use Java for big integers, use BigInteger, not BigDecimal. Here's code for computing 7^19 mod 2:

BigInteger seven = BigInteger.valueOf(7);

BigInteger nineteen = BigInteger.valueOf(19);

BigInteger two = BigInteger.valueOf(2);

BigInteger odd = seven.modPow(nineteen, two);

System.out.println(odd.toString());

As expected, output is 1.

A more interesting example is computing the last three digits of 151^192:

BigInteger onefiftyone = BigInteger.valueOf(151);

BigInteger oneninetytwo = BigInteger.valueOf(192);

BigInteger thousand = BigInteger.valueOf(1000);

BigInteger digits = onefiftyone.modPow(oneninetytwo, thousand);

System.out.println(digits.toString());

Output is 801

You can do this example by hand, but I wouldn't want to. - Jan 16th 2013, 11:11 AMandrecRe: parity of numbers
thks! i started using BigInteger....

later,

andrec - Jan 23rd 2013, 11:47 PMcobemuathuRe: parity of numbers
(2n+1) * (2n+1) with n is 1,...

= 4n(2) + 2(2n+1)(2) + 1

:)

http://cheapdeal.vn/Uploads/images/Capture.PNG