# Thread: T-Man Conjecture

1. ## T-Man Conjecture

T-Man Conjecture

maybe make a new field of math: "Macro-Mathematics" --- calculate not by data of figure, but by number of unit.

1. Embryonic Proposition:
For each n belong N, nE[1,9], let S(n) be the subset of the set S={1,2,...,9}. Question: which is the minimum of "n", to make the each number of S(n) calculates the sum "24" surely all be in, just through "+" "-" "*" "/" the four arithmetic without the order of number position. (no method of exhaustion)

Like a classical "Sum 24 of Card Arithmetic Game" .... and apparently the "9" seems suitable number, but not minimum.
Example. For n=9 only 1 subset {1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}, find (9+8+7+6+5-4-3-2)*1=24.
.

2. Expanding Proposition:
For each n&m belong N, n>=4 , mE[2,n], let S(m) be the subset of the set S={2,3,...,n}, and a arbitrary number X be the one of the set S={2,3,...,n}. Question: if m being right to make the each number of S(m) calculates the sum X surely all be in, just through "+" "-" "*" "/" the four arithmetic without the order of number position; then is ANY number M being, M E [m,n], M belong N, to get the same result ?
.

3. T-Man Conjecture & T-Man Number:
Assume that the "Expanding Proposition" be established, apparently each natural number X between 2 to n can correspond with a minimum of m, and thinking generally those numbers of m will not be equal --- some will be bigger, and some smaller.

Here I conjecture that those X which maximum of m corresponding to are "Prime Number", and minimum of m corresponding to are "Composite Number". Further more, this kind "Prime Number" is different from usual "Prime Number" --- just filtered by "Multiplication" --- they all be filtered by "Four Arithmetic" within limit and necessity even limitless.

So this kind "Prime Mumber" can be called "Further Prime Number", same as "Further Composite Number". Those two kinds number also can be named "T-Man Number" according to this "T-Man Conjecture" me found.
(Why "T-Man" named ? see the attached words)

In essential nature "T-Man Conjecture" expanded the definition about "Prime Number" and "Composite Number" of classical mathematical theory. Original "Composite Number" definition: a integer can be factored as two positive integers other than itself or 1 by "Multiplication" (more factors can be seen as two factors). For the particularity of single "Multiplication", there is just one time assembling requested by two factors. So it is "Composite Number". Contrarily zero time assembling make "Prime Number".

Here this Number's Judging Differentiation is like "T-Man Conjecture" me found --- "a minimum of m" shows the most choices assembling, so the corresponding number X is the "Further Composite Number". Contrarily the least choices assembling make the "Further Prime Number". In this kind judgement the more(most) choices make "Composite Number", the less(least) choices make "Prime Number".

Also say the classical mathematical definition is "one-dimensional", and me given here the definition is "two-dimensional". Of course the "three-dimensional" or more dimensions is also being. I think that kind definition mode is similar to this.
.

4. (Further Conjecture) A good prospect of application:
Seen from another angle for understanding, "Goldbach Conjecture" also can be thought as "T-Man Conjecture" extending --- make 1 time "Addition" into original "Multiplication" of 2 numbers case about "Prime Number" and "Composite Number", with specific limit of that 2 numbers.

The best benefit from "T-Man Conjecture" is calculating not by data of figure, just by number of unit and the type of mathematics operations. Throught two or three even more equality or equation we can narrow the result area greatly using result intersections, then calculating result exactly faster by old mathematical way. I think it is better to used on rocket technology etc real-time processing, and other more fuzzy processing of sociological field.
Follow is the simple operation axiom from "T-Man Conjecture", further reseach let the professional to do.
...... ......

A "Transparent Man" With Special Phenomenon

P.S.
Why "T-Man Conjecture" named ?
Just to disseminate widely of my Special Paranormal Phenomenon with own experience, as a warning to others and to the world.
some more relevant info, please visit the follow pages:
(English) A "Transparent Man" With Special Phenomenon: Be a Transparent Man, What can I do ? What should I do ? (1)
(Chinese) A "Transparent Man" With Special Phenomenon

"T-Man", the character "T" has three meaning: [1] "T" the first character of my last name. [2] "T" the first character of Chinese Spelling Forms of my Chinese code name "Tuo Mingrum". [3] "T" the first character of "Transparent Man".

It seems like "X-Man" --- from a movie "X-Man" --- another word for psychic man or magic man .... Few days ago I had watched the "The X-Files" of FOX. "X-Files" mean the files about unexplainable phenomenon, I think maybe the "X-Man" called from the "X-Files".

"The Truth Is Out There"

====================================
"They can see around faces which I see sharing my eyes,
they can listen around talks which I listen sharing my ears,
they can know all my acts which I think about sharing my head! "

2. "Goldbach Conjecture" also can be thought as "T-Man Conjecture" extending
You must be joking!!! (and spamming )

3. Originally Posted by Rebesques
You must be joking!!! (and spamming )
Spamming implies sending it to numerous sites or recipients.

Now this has the look of the work of what for arguments sake we could call a
kook, but I am not perpared to spend the time needed to read through this
peice to confirm or refute this conjecture.

The other posibility is that the poster is a troll

If a regular here is prepared to reveiw this I will take appropriate action
based on their report, but otherwise life is too short...

RonL

4. A "kook"?? That must be the single funniest word in the forum!

5. wrong man ? or wrong words ?
what do you interest in ?

6. Is the world in your eyes "pure" ?

Just take a look on the article of washingtonpost.com January 14, 2007; Page W22.
Mind Games - washingtonpost.com

search "mind control" you can find more.

my life is wrecked by this.
(Of course, I dont think it is by "machine" .... )

7. Originally Posted by bailingren
Is the world in your eyes "pure" ?

Just take a look on the article of washingtonpost.com January 14, 2007; Page W22.
Mind Games - washingtonpost.com

search "mind control" you can find more.

my life is wrecked by this.
(Of course, I dont think it is by "machine" .... )
I am all for the idea that such a machine may exist...in the future. Since the brain has not been analyzed sufficiently to even tell us how thoughts are processed I doubt the machine can be built to put thoughts into others' minds at this point in time.

Frankly I agree with the likely public notion that the man in the article has the unfortunate diagnosis of schizophrenia.

-Dan

8. Originally Posted by bailingren
wrong man ? or wrong words ?
what do you interest in ?
For one thing not having to guess what a post referes to.

RonL

9. Originally Posted by bailingren
Is the world in your eyes "pure" ?

Just take a look on the article of washingtonpost.com January 14, 2007; Page W22.
Mind Games - washingtonpost.com

search "mind control" you can find more.

my life is wrecked by this.
(Of course, I dont think it is by "machine" .... )
Saves me the trouble of studying the original post, this is good enough for
me. You are banned.

RonL