Sam lives on a lot that he thought was a square, 157 feet by 157 feet. When he had it surveyed , he discovered that one side was actaully 2 feet longer then he thought and the other was actually 2 feet shorter then he thought. How much less area does he have then he thought he had?
I was coming up with this anwer 457 ft less then he thought, would that be right?
Hello, fancyface!
This doesn't require any algebra at all.
So exactly where is your difficulty?
Sam lives on a lot that he thought was a square, 157 feet by 157 feet.
When he had it surveyed, he discovered that
one side was actaully 2 feet longer then he thought
and the other was actually 2 feet shorter then he thought.
How much less area does he have then he thought he had?
Sam thought he had:ft².
Instead, his lot was actually 159 feet by 155 feet.
. . So he had:ft².
Let's see, that's a difference of . . . um . . . (Where's my calculator?)
It depends on where those two sides with errors are on the lot.Originally Posted by fancyface
a) If two opposite sides were actually 159 ft each, and so the other two opposites were actually 155 ft each, then,
He thought the area was (157)(157) = 157^2
But actual area =
= (157 +2)(157 -2)
= 157^2 -2^2
= (Area of square lot he thought) minus 4.
Therfore, the actual lot is 4 sq. ft. less than he thought.
b) If the two sides with errors are adjacent to each other, then the actual lot area can be computed by dividing the actual lot into two triangles. One triangle is an isosceles rigth triangle; the other is a not a right triangle but whose 3 sides are 159, 157 and the hypotenuse of the isosceles right triangle. Not as easy to do. Lots of square roots. Heron's formula.
c) If the two erroneous sides are opposite each other, then there are two possible ways, depending on which erroneous side is perpendicular to one of the 157-ft side. Again, same method as in part b) above for each way.
  |
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks