Results 1 to 7 of 7

Math Help - Simultaneous equations

  1. #1
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    20

    Simultaneous equations

    I'm trying to solve these as opposed to using the matrix method (which I don't fully understand yet) but can't see where I go wrong. e2 should be 1.8 but I'm getting 1.61. Could the difference be due to not using enough decimal places or something I'm not doing right?

    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #2
    Super Member
    earboth's Avatar
    Joined
    Jan 2006
    From
    Germany
    Posts
    5,830
    Thanks
    123
    Quote Originally Posted by hciR View Post
    I'm trying to solve these as opposed to using the matrix method (which I don't fully understand yet) but can't see where I go wrong. e2 should be 1.8 but I'm getting 1.61. Could the difference be due to not using enough decimal places or something I'm not doing right?
    You have used the wrong numbers. For instance:

    \frac3{8200} = 0.00036585... = 3.6585 \cdot 10^{-4}~\neq~3.6585^{-4}
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #3
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    20
    I realise i've wrote it down wrong, but thats just because I was too lazy to write x10^-4. When putting it in my calculator I wrote it in correctly (3.659times10x^y-4)
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #4
    Member
    Joined
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    138
    First issue is that it is hard to read the image. So it is difficult to check your arithmetic. Based on:
    <br />
( \frac{1}{8200}+\frac{1}{1500}+\frac{1}{3900} ) e_1 - \frac{1}{1500}e_2 = \frac{3}{8200}<br />

    <br />
-\frac{1}{1500}e_1 + ( \frac{1}{3900} + \frac{1}{1500} + \frac{1}{8200} ) e_2= \frac{3}{3900}<br />

    I got your answers of 1.38 and 1.61 (the latter really should be rounded to 1.62 since I am getting 1.617). My guess is a) either the starting equations are wrong, or b) the answer of 1.8 is wrong.

    Somewhat beside the point but why are you adding (1)+(2)? This is unnecessary. Just take your (3) (which is equivalent to (1) and substitute it into (2).

    Incidentally, the matrix method is exactly the same as working with the equations, only it it more compact (less notation).

    Finally, if you want to be lazy but still be correct, you just need to add E:
    3.65 \cdot 10^{-4} becomes 3.65E-4
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #5
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    20
    Ok you got the same answers which is good. I'm not quite sure why I added (1) and (2) but I can see that you don't need to now.
    I'm following a course, the PDF is here with the equations on page 16 and the solution on page 19.
    Would the "E" button just be labelled "E" or do you have to press shift and something else?
    Thanks
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #6
    Member
    Joined
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    138
    Quote Originally Posted by hciR View Post
    Ok you got the same answers which is good. I'm not quite sure why I added (1) and (2) but I can see that you don't need to now.
    I'm following a course, the PDF is here with the equations on page 16 and the solution on page 19.
    It looks to me that the equations that both you and I have written down match each other and match what is on page 17 (which is equivalent to what is on 16). Take your solutions and plug them into the original equations. If they both work, then you got it right and they have a typo. If not then we're doing something silly.


    Quote Originally Posted by hciR View Post
    Would the "E" button just be labelled "E" or do you have to press shift and something else?
    Thanks
    I just meant when posting a message or writing down on paper. But yes you can do it on a calculator, and on mine (some obscure and now out-dated TI-85), I think you just hit EE button. (i.e. 3.65EE-4 does what you want).

    See your calculator manual for details.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #7
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    20
    I put the answers back into the equation and it does work so maybe there is a typo, I will go through what they have on the pdf and see if I can spot something.
    I found if you press shift then log, it gives you a 10^x symbo l
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Simultaneous Equations 4 variables, 4 equations
    Posted in the Pre-Calculus Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: December 7th 2011, 05:06 PM
  2. Simultaneous equations.
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 16th 2011, 06:09 PM
  3. Simultaneous log equations
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: March 28th 2010, 07:52 AM
  4. Replies: 3
    Last Post: February 27th 2009, 08:05 PM
  5. simultaneous equations
    Posted in the Algebra Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: February 5th 2009, 10:20 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum