time is vector quantity or scalar bn y??????if scalar yy??
thanks 4 spending ur time
Indeed. A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing lol!
On the other hand, I always like to use the line as insurance against someone jumping in and saying "Hmpppph, well ...... it just so happens that ...."
And you never know .... one of those pre-calc kids might just otherwise come back in 10 yrs time and say "You rat, you liar. You told me .... and I believed you, man. I. Believed. You. sob ......"
hehe, yeah, i know, that's how i'd feel. but i'd just tell them that's the way of the world. "hey, when i was in kindergarden, they told me i can't subtract a bigger number from a smaller one. now i do that everyday. how do you think that makes me feel?! suck it up and stop being a cry baby!"
anyway, at what "level" or in what context would time be a vector quantity?
And here I was just going to string things along for awhile ......
Actually there was a recent article in New Scientist (13 Oct 2007 pp 36-39) that might make accessible follow-up reading to CaptainBlack's answer. A Google search of two-time physics might also provide interest.
Time can be considered as a vector with positive direction pointing from past to future along the direction in which all senses follow. It is still difficult to find a negative time because no way our senses can observe in a direction against the above mentioned.
One might claim that I can run the video of a glass breaking in reverse to see it join back again --- thus I am seeing time go in negative direction. However, while the videotape is being run, time is going to flow from past to future.