Prove or disprove :
The set of limit points of an uncountable set of real numbers is uncountable .
This is easier said in more general terms.
Lemma: Ifis second countable and
is covered by
then
omits a countable subcover
.
Proof:Call the countable open base. For each
there exists some set
such that
. But, we have that there exists some
such that
. Clearly then the collection
covers
and is countable. Taking an
which contains
for each
finishes the argument.
Now we can prove the problem at hand.
Letbe second countable and
uncountable, then
is uncountable.
Assume not. Then,is countable and so
is uncountable. But, since each point
is in particular not a limit point of
there exists a neighborhood
such that
. Clearly the class
is an open cover for
and so by the lemma it must admit a finite subcover
. But,
but since each
is a singleton it follows that
is countable Contradiction.
Your problem is a corollary sinceis a dense subset of
and every separable metric space is second countable.
Figured it out just too late![]()
Thanks for the proof, I'll give it the attention which it deserves when I'm not dead tired! Exams begin tomorrow.
(After all, what you had written before worked also. Why did you remove it? Every point ofis an isolated point, and so
has the cardinality of a collection of disjoint open sets, which is countable.)
Because the needn't be disjoint. I was being stupid. Clearly they can intersect but they cannot contain each other. For examplecould be two of the sets if [math[\frac{1}{2},2\in E[/tex] since they're intersection with
could easily be a singleton but they aren't disjoint.