Find![]()

Another way? What does (s)he want? Hmm ...
Letand let
.
The substitutionshows that
.
The substituionshows that
and so
.
Thusby symmetry.
Now putso that
,
for
and
, and
.
Thus.
Thus.
Wait a moment, this is merely a disguised version of themethod. It's no better than NonCommAlg's rejected solution.
(Thinks: Perhaps I should have used an infinite series, or some kind of limit, or introduced a parameter, or ... (Mind boggles at this point))
An answer that is not really an answer? This is trickier than it looks.
Hmm ...