Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Math Help - MathType

  1. #16
    Newbie
    Joined
    Jun 2008
    From
    Yorkshire
    Posts
    9
    And it don't work with HP printers! running Vista. But thinks again, what does work with Vista?
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  2. #17
    Grand Panjandrum
    Joined
    Nov 2005
    From
    someplace
    Posts
    14,972
    Thanks
    4
    Quote Originally Posted by goldbh View Post
    And it don't work with HP printers! running Vista. But thinks again, what does work with Vista?
    Can you provide some more context, this seems a bit improbable, maybe with more explanation we can sort out the problem, or if not at least understand what is going on.

    RonL
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  3. #18
    Bar0n janvdl's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2007
    From
    South Africa
    Posts
    1,630
    Thanks
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by goldbh View Post
    And it don't work with HP printers! running Vista. But thinks again, what does work with Vista?
    I don't think your HP printer is the problem.
    The printer driver however is a likely culprit, as you may not have the Vista one installed.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  4. #19
    Super Member wingless's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    Istanbul
    Posts
    585
    MathType is expensive, looks ugly and totally amateurish, in my opinion.

    Microsoft Office: $100-200
    MathType: $97


    Here is a much better and totally free system:

    -OpenOffice.org: Free, open-source office package. It is way better than MS Office.

    -MikTeX: A free LaTeX implementation for Windows.

    -GhostScript: A free PS and PDF interpreter.

    -MSYS: Open-source, minimal portable o/s interface.

    And finally:
    -OpenOffice.org LaTeX Plugin (OooLaTeX)


    Links for these free software are here:

    -OpenOffice.org
    -MikTeX
    -GhostScript
    -MSYS 1.0.10
    -OooLaTeX

    Now you can install them in the order above and all you have to do is to show OooLaTeX where GhostScript, MikTeX and MSYS are. Then you can use it =)


    Result:
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  5. #20
    Global Moderator

    Joined
    Nov 2005
    From
    New York City
    Posts
    10,616
    Thanks
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by wingless View Post
    MathType is expensive, looks ugly and totally amateurish, in my opinion.
    LaTeX is for mathematicians. MathType is for physicists.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  6. #21
    Math Engineering Student
    Krizalid's Avatar
    Joined
    Mar 2007
    From
    Santiago, Chile
    Posts
    3,654
    Thanks
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by wingless View Post

    MathType looks ugly and totally amateurish, in my opinion.
    Yes, it useful to generate LaTeX codes.

    Quote Originally Posted by ThePerfectHacker View Post

    LaTeX is for mathematicians. MathType is for physicists.
    I'm not a Physicist, but it's really comfortable to generate faster LaTeX codes.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  7. #22
    Junior Member Mr.MathType's Avatar
    Joined
    Apr 2008
    From
    Austin TX
    Posts
    35
    Thanks
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by wingless View Post
    MathType is expensive, looks ugly and totally amateurish, in my opinion.
    Yes, Wingless, that LaTeX integral does look very nice. However, in order to have a fair comparison of the look of LaTeX vs. the look of MathType, you need to be using the same fonts. MathType includes the Euclid font set, which looks similar to LaTeX's Computer Modern font. Also, you didn't use an "expanding" integral symbol in your MathType equation. Here's a better comparison, using the same equation you used.



    The LaTeX doesn't look as crisp as the MathType equation, but that's because it's a screen shot. Normally it would look sharper than that, but that's not the point. The point is that if this is the look you want, you can almost achieve an identical look with MathType as what you get with LaTeX.

    BTW, for MathType users, you create an expanding integral by holding down the Shift key when you click on the integral template in the palette. Don't use this when you're using MathType to create LaTeX though, because it will give you a translation error. Just use the normal integral, and the LaTeX renderer will expand it if necessary.

    Bob Mathews
    Last edited by Mr.MathType; June 9th 2008 at 07:33 AM. Reason: Forgot signature
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

  8. #23
    Super Member wingless's Avatar
    Joined
    Dec 2007
    From
    Istanbul
    Posts
    585
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr.MathType View Post
    The point is that if this is the look you want, you can almost achieve an identical look with MathType as what you get with LaTeX.
    No, you can't achieve an almost identical look. MathType is not even close to the aesthetic look of LaTeX. Yes, MathType is useful for creating LaTeX formulas and is enough for posting on web. But there are tons of software that do such stuff for free. If I'm going to pay $97 for a software, it should have some unique and useful features.
    Follow Math Help Forum on Facebook and Google+

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Similar Math Help Forum Discussions

  1. Mathtype Test
    Posted in the LaTeX Help Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 27th 2011, 05:53 AM
  2. Only A Test of Using MathType
    Posted in the LaTeX Help Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 10th 2011, 11:37 PM
  3. Just A Test of Using MathType 6.6
    Posted in the LaTeX Help Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 10th 2011, 07:18 PM
  4. MathType Quandry
    Posted in the Math Software Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 25th 2010, 04:07 PM
  5. MathType
    Posted in the LaTeX Help Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: April 23rd 2009, 09:46 PM

Search Tags


/mathhelpforum @mathhelpforum