Typing in [tex]\therefore[/tex] gives $\displaystyle \therefore$

Typing in [tex]\because[/tex] gives $\displaystyle \because$

Printable View

- Nov 26th 2006, 04:05 PMQuick
- Nov 26th 2006, 04:10 PMOReilly
- Nov 26th 2006, 04:39 PMTriKri
$\displaystyle \because$ it works

$\displaystyle \therefore$LaTeX is great! - Nov 27th 2006, 10:58 AMTriKri
How do you type in %? My webbrowser didn't wanna display the page when I created a LaTeX formula with % in it as always when something in the LaTeX code is wrong.

- Nov 27th 2006, 10:59 AMQuick
- Nov 28th 2006, 10:17 AMTriKri
Typing [tex]\sum_{i\ =\ 0}^n f(i)[/tex] gives $\displaystyle \sum_{i\ =\ 0}^n f(i)$, a Sigma sign as a sum sign. But how do you do if you want to have a multiplication sign, a Pi sign ($\displaystyle \Pi$) that works like the sum sign?

- Nov 28th 2006, 10:24 AMThePerfectHacker
- Nov 29th 2006, 10:31 AMTriKri
Is it possible to put a big cross all over the formula to make clear it is not true?

- Nov 29th 2006, 11:32 AMQuick
- Dec 1st 2006, 03:45 PMTriKri
Can you make some part of the expression appear in another color?

- Dec 1st 2006, 06:38 PMTriKri
Problems with \left and \right:

$\displaystyle \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)$

$\displaystyle \left[\frac{x}{y}\right]$

$\displaystyle \left|\frac{x}{y}\right|$

But [tex]\left{\frac{x}{y}\right}[/tex] doesn't work. - Dec 2nd 2006, 02:03 AMCaptainBlack
- Dec 5th 2006, 03:53 AM^_^Engineer_Adam^_^
$\displaystyle \lim_{x \to 2^+}$

- Dec 10th 2006, 05:25 PMtopsquark
[tex]\int testing^2 1 \cdot 2 \cdot 3[/tex]

-Dan - Dec 10th 2006, 08:24 PMCaptainBlack