Just out of curiosity, why did the admins go with Latex over Mathml or something else?
Printable View
Just out of curiosity, why did the admins go with Latex over Mathml or something else?
I looked up MathML just now, and I have to say, I would definitely not enjoy working with MathML source code. I can only imagine what continued fractions would look like... (Thinking)
I concur with you, it actually writes the quadratic formula like this :
Compare this with LaTeX :Code:<math>
<mrow>
<mi>x</mi>
<mo>=</mo>
<mfrac>
<mrow>
<mrow>
<mo>-</mo>
<mi>b</mi>
</mrow>
<mo>±</mo>
<msqrt>
<mrow>
<msup>
<mi>b</mi>
<mn>2</mn>
</msup>
<mo>-</mo>
<mrow>
<mn>4</mn>
<mo>⁢</mo>
<mi>a</mi>
<mo>⁢</mo>
<mi>c</mi>
</mrow>
</mrow>
</msqrt>
</mrow>
<mrow>
<mn>2</mn>
<mo>⁢</mo>
<mi>a</mi>
</mrow>
</mfrac>
</mrow>
</math>
It's even worse than standard ASCII notation :Code:x = \frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^4 - 4ac}}{2a}
:(Code:x = (-b +- sqrt(b^2 - 4ac)) / 2a
Also, check out what the authors said about MathML :
Human-readable, what a joke ! :DQuote:
While MathML is human-readable, it is anticipated that, in all but the simplest cases, authors will use equation editors, conversion programs, and other specialized software tools to generate MathML. Several early versions of such MathML tools already exist, and a number of others, both freely available software and commercial products, are under development.
I thought about it because MathML is backed by W3C.