Intersection of Line and Hyperbola
A hyperbola is intersected by line 1 at
and )
and by line 2 at
and )
Lines 1 and 2 intersect at )
These can be written
)
)
I am trying to find a general solution for the values of
and
.
I have tried squaring (1) and adding\subtracting various multiples of (2), but this just brings me various fractions of the starting values.
Any help or pointers would be greatly appreciated
re: Intersection of Line and Hyperbola
ok,
Here's where I am so far...




then we need
(v_1-y)=u_1v_1)



Is this as far as I can go?
Re: Intersection of Line and Hyperbola
I had forgotten about one of the original constraints

This works out to 
Taking this with the
from the previous result I have

This gives
\pm\sqrt{u_1^2+6u_1v_1+v_1^2}}{ 2})
So for integer solutions
must be a perfect square.
Re: Intersection of Line and Hyperbola
I have red your posts and it's confusing in my opinion, what do you want to calculate or show? ...
Re: Intersection of Line and Hyperbola
Hi,
With the original equations


The only way to find values for
is by trial and error.
I am trying to find a general solution.
It is similar to the diophantine solution for a pythagorean triple
In the attempt I've made so far, the
\pm\sqrt{u_1^2+6u_1v_1+v_1^2}}{ 2})
and whatever
will work out to be ( a similar expression to y)
If I can make sure that x and y are integers, I would have correct numbers to satisfy the original equations
Re: Intersection of Line and Hyperbola
OK, I'll try giving an example of what I'm looking for
Take 
If one sets
and
then 
By choosing any integer m>1 a, b and c will be a pythagorean triple.
This doesn't give all pythaorean triples, but it does give an infinite amount of them, which is usually enough :D
I'm looking for a similar way of getting numbers that satisfy the 2 equations in the op.


I had made further progress from my last post after I noticed that
u_2 is not only greater than u_1, but also )
+x)

This satisfies the first equation. When solving with the second equation I would have



which is no further forward :(
Quick synopsis of where I am at the moment


=\dfrac{u_1v_1}{u_2})
u_2-u_1v_1=0)
\pm\sqrt{(u_1+v_1)^2+4u_1v_1}} {2})
similarly
\pm\sqrt{(u_1+v_1)^2+4u_1v_1}}{2})
Solving for
being a perfect square leads me back to the beginning.